Inadmissible Hair
Or, Not Neurotic Enough.
From Vancouver, via Alex Zoltan, an attempt to attend a “2SLGBTIAQ+-friendly” outdoor theatre is derailed by some cultural-sensitivity complications:
A woman in Vancouver was denied access to a “2SLGBTIAQ+-friendly” outdoor theatre because her hair violated the venue’s “Code of Conduct Cultural Appropriation policy.” pic.twitter.com/reB5DbDtL1
— Alex Zoltan (@AmazingZoltan) August 15, 2025
You see, madam’s hair – or rather, her woollen hair extension – violates the venue’s “Code of Conduct Cultural Appropriation Policy.”
Which is a thing, apparently.
Readers may not be entirely surprised to learn that the list of terms and conditions is somewhat extensive and includes both pre-emptive scolding that is nebulous and therefore open to interpretation by those so inclined:
And pre-emptive scolding that is more particular:
Because pronoun policing is the basis of every good night out. And with regard to madam’s supposedly scandalous hair:
That’s the non-consensual wearing of your own clothes and hair.
You see,
We’re talking, you’ll recall, about a trip to a “2SLGBTIAQ+-friendly” outdoor theatre. In the hope of a jolly time.
We’re also informed, sternly, that people of pallor do not experience,
And that,
Again, at a venue where luridly cross-dressing men can pretend to be women and must always be addressed with their fabulist pronouns.
In short, attendees must,
Those forever downtrodden magic brown people.
And transvestites.
I feel I should point out that the interaction filmed above goes on for nine minutes. You may wish to have a fortifying beverage to hand.
Or something to bite down on.
The complications of progressive fun times – specifically, what can only be referred to as ideological dancing – have been mentioned here before.
So the “migrant” wasn’t merely “in her mother’s flat”.
“Getting medieval” seems less outrageous with each passing day.
I don’t know…I have suggested to white leftists, upon being called raaaaycisss for the umpteen millionth time that I would be happy to let one PoC into the US if I had the power to vet them and then also be able to toss two or three white AWFLs or similar white devil commies out. Preferably to Venezuela, North Korea, Chi-na, or virtually anywhere in Africa. Anywhere outside the US at a minimum. I have yet to hear back from any of them.
Pretty sure “you can’t come in because you are white and we don’t allow white people in with that hair adornment” is illegal in both BC and Washington State so whichever Vancouver this is that venue is breaking laws against racism..
Third world driver murders three in Florida.
Betcha there are “questions” about his certification to drive in America.
But I only have one question: Should he be executed? Or executed slowly?
Printed article here.
I’ve been seeing occasional posts online about third world truck drivers who cannot read English, do not understand road signs, don’t know the law, and don’t care. “Fuck those gringos and their laws designed to oppress the brown man!”
The catecism for progs is (repeat after me):
We hate:
whites
boobs
families
peace
manly men
pretty things
making money
We unquestionably support:
murderers
terrorists
corrupt pols
So . . . is the New York Times endorsing originalism?
We were the first generation to be told insistently that nationalism is intrinsically bad. Everybody is the same under the skin. Violence is never the answer. All cultural values are relative. Racism is the worst possible thing. You must love even people who hate you. And so on, and so on…
Heinlein was noticing this at least as far back as the 50’s.