Elsewhere (307)
Razib Khan reviews Charles Murray’s Facing Reality:
Comfortable white people—“nice white parents” in affluent neighbourhoods who support efforts to “defund the police”—can refuse to look into the data or insist that those data are the product of racist systems and structures. They can “interrogate their privilege” and “confront their white supremacy,” or better yet, demand that others do so. But they won’t be any closer to understanding why poor African Americans and Latinos in inner-city neighbourhoods want more police officers in their neighbourhoods and not fewer, nor why poor African American parents clamour for access to strict charter schools that activists condemn for being “anti-black.” Principled ignorance might be a costless gesture for affluent progressives, but they’re heaping additional injustice onto the backs of those who can least afford the wages of social signalling.
Ben Sixsmith on when paedophilia was avant-garde:
The German Green party was especially notable for its enablement of child abuse. As the Times of London reported in 2015, “a paedophile network was active in the Berlin branch of the Green party until the mid-1990s, with potentially hundreds of victims.” Daniel Cohn-Bendit, a leading student activist in the 1968 unrest and a prominent member of the Greens, wrote fantasies about sexual contact with children which he later awkwardly described as “irresponsible” and “a type of manifesto against the bourgeois society.” Cohn-Bendit was not, as you might assume, a hair-brained student when he wrote that filth, but 30 years old. Perhaps the bourgeois society had something — at least something — to be said for it.
Hans Bader on woke bigotry and a dishonest news media:
On July 15, a Reuters fact-check claimed that “many Americans embrace falsehoods about critical race theory.” But it is Reuters that embraced a falsehood, not the American people. Reuters denied that critical race theory teaches that “discriminating against white people is the only way to achieve equality,” saying that was a “misconception” promoted by “conservative media outlets.”
It’s not a misconception. It’s the explicit position of the most famous exponent of critical race theory, Boston University’s Ibram X. Kendi. The “key concept” in Kendi’s book How to Be an Antiracist is that discrimination against whites is the only way to achieve equality: “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination,” writes Kendi in that book, a New York Times bestseller touted by many progressive journalists… Kendi’s book… is a “comprehensive introduction to critical race theory,” notes the leading progressive media organ Slate. Kendi says he was “inspired by critical race theory,” and he has been described as a leading “critical race theorist.” Kendi said that he cannot “imagine a pathway to” his teachings “that does not engage CRT.”
Reuters says it is a fallacy to believe that critical race theory teaches “that white people are inherently bad or evil.” But it is hard to justify widespread discrimination against white people, as Kendi does, unless you believe they are bad. Kendi once wrote an op-ed suggesting that white people are aliens from outer space.
And Tyler Hummel on some of Mr Kendi’s fellow hustlers:
The University of Kentucky paid $5,000 to the Centre for Healing Racial Trauma for the workshop… Titled “Cultivating an Anti-Racist Mindset for Academic Administrators,” the workshop was hosted last winter by the centre, which offers trainings designed to heal people of racism and teach them to be anti-racist, among other services. The centre is run by University of Kentucky psychology Professor Candice Hargons… The session involved deans and other top faculty writing out their “chosen metric for anti-racism,” to whom they have chosen to be accountable, and the steps they have taken thus far to address it… Mary Davis, [dean of the University of Kentucky’s J. David Rosenberg College of Law,] wrote she has begun to “force myself to accept white inferiority,” and that it is “really hard.”
During this jolly barn dance of intersectional psychodrama, weak-minded administrators are instructed to “replace white supremacy with the more accurate white inferiority complex,” an allegedly all-pervasive phenomenon that, we’re told, “organises most systems in the USA.”
Ah, yes. Ectoplasm everywhere. Can you feel the healing yet?
Feel free to share your own links and snippets, on any subject, in the comments.
Public awareness of movie directors wasn’t always the mass-phenomenon it became from the 1970s on; but already in the 1920s through early sixties a substantial part of the audience did know and care about directing, and they weren’t film snobs. They went to the same pictures and watched them the same way as everyone else, and often as not would have named much the same favorite films. Being able to pick out what the director has done adds a dimension to the enjoyment, even though it’s complete without: same as in any other art experience, the more you know the greater the pleasure, because it’s yet one more way you can turn the experience over in your mind
“The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination,” writes Kendi
Black privilege.
Black privilege
Well, Mr Kendi is by no means a gifted or rigorous thinker. His outpourings are a patchwork of unsupported statements, factual errors, and life-ruining advice. He tells us, for instance, that black people are somehow harmed by expectations of competence, reciprocation and effort – which he disdains as “racist” – and can only be “liberated” when they “reject cultural standards,” i.e., personal responsibility, diligence, punctuality, etc. And his books are given to children in middle schools across the US.
Luckily for Mr Kendi, he seems to inhabit a world in which claims needn’t be supported with evidence, or be coherently articulated. His adult audiences are remarkably, pathologically, indulgent, and seemingly untroubled by the scarcity of evidence, the wild inaccuracies, and the disregard for logic.
As noted in the thread following this,
Just a thought.
More Deep Thoughts™ from Kendi, being called racist is just like a doctor telling you that you have cancer.
Also the person
doing the race baitingidentifying the racism is just trying to help and the next step is “treatment”, which probably involves large transfers of cash.which probably involves large transfers of cash.
He’s evidently good at parting racially neurotic lefties from their money, and their sense. He may be a stranger to logic and evidence, to facts of almost any kind, and he may beg questions at a rate of knots, but he hustles like a pro. He knows a progressive rube when he sees one. As so often, the audiences Mr Kendi attracts tend to be more interesting than he is, at least morbidly. His grifter’s patter is the standard contortion of his kind and therefore tedious, but the people who sit and listen, and fawn and coo, are supposedly educated, generally at great expense. Critical thinkers, no less. And yet they reliably ignore the tautologies, the evasions, and the obvious factual errors. Because…
And there’s something almost funny about Mr Kendi pointedly using the words skill and expertise when referring to people such as himself. But mainly himself, one assumes.
[ Edited. ]
he seems to inhabit a world
Wakanda?
(Well, ’tis a movie reference)
As always, it’s easy to be caught up in the stereotyping. It’s a useful method to categorize people, but harmful when it’s used in politics and public policy. I would not characterize myself as a film snob for paying attention to mis en scene and certain director’s trademarks, because when you’re watching a Guillermo del Toro, Edgar Wright, or (obviously, from my name) Tarantino movie, you can’t help but see them.
(In fact, I’ll be seeing Wright’s “Last Night in Soho” in the theater even tho I generally do not like horror movies.)
If anything, I’m the film snob’s nightmare. I’m a fan of good storytelling, despise Rotten Tomatoes for reducing criticism to unhelpful percentages, and appreciate sometimes despised actors (Will Ferrell and Melissa McCarthy, who both seem to inspire unhinged rage by the mere mention of their names) in what I consider to be good movies (the near-universally despised “Holmes & Watson” and McCarthy’s Atlanta-based movies like “Tammy.”).
pst314 didn’t even quote the best parts.
By intention. But I should have provided a link. Thank you for repairing my fault.
semi retired conservative: ’ And I for one have had enough of smarmy kids in every fucking movie being made..’
Amen! About the only movies I’m currently looking forward to are ‘Suicide Squad’, the ‘Top Gun’ sequel and Spielberg’s ‘West Side Story’ (though that only really for the ‘why…?’ aspect).
Guaranteed no smarmy kids.
To be clear… I fell for the snob word without proper delineation. To me there’s a huge difference between having a great appreciation for how a work is done, an ability to see the details that others don’t, and being a snob. A snob is more someone who blathers about how great an artist is mostly because they know/think the artist is great because everyone else says so. I thought my reference to Leonard Maltin and Siskel & Ebert would make that clear. My father could look at a bridge, building, arena and see the fine engineering, and especially welding, involved in creating that. I wouldn’t say he was an engineering snob. I myself developed somewhat similar appreciation, based on what he taught me. But not specifically for the buildings he appreciated or things I may have read in books or such. Though I suppose I can bore my wife with such observations. Though she has yet to object.
To be a bit clearer again, I can sometimes appreciate a bad film for reasons beyond the whole. What really impresses me are the films with large crowd scenes or a huge cast. I was even an extra in one such film once, a not very good film, that helped me appreciate how much effort, work, coordination, etc. goes into producing such things. I get that. My concern is that the eye is off the ball of creating a good work that tells a good story and is now about damn near everything else. So smaaaaart people at cocktail parties can talk all smaaaart.
So smaaaaart people at cocktail parties can talk all smaaaart.
Indeed, indeed. It is a delight to meet someone who enjoys sharing insights. It is tiresome to meet someone who enjoys demonstrating their superiority.
His adult audiences are remarkably, pathologically, indulgent, and seemingly untroubled by the scarcity of evidence, the wild inaccuracies, and the disregard for logic.
Yeah, but that’s not just his audiences. That’s the broader market. He’s successful because the damage was done, the battlefield was cleared for him by academia, the media, the arts, etc. He can reach so far because he stands on the shoulders of giants…so to speak…’ogres’ perhaps a better word.
It is a delight to meet someone who enjoys sharing insights. It is tiresome to meet someone who enjoys demonstrating their superiority.
I think I read that very same proverb once in The Curia…
I think I read that very same proverb once in The Curia…
Was that the blog that the insufferable Hal9000 kept linking to?
Aykroyd came up with the Ghostbusters concept for him and Belushi after Blues Brothers showed that the original SNL audience would turn out to the movies to see them.
Back then I worked a block away from the New York Public Library. One day I walked by and the Ghostbusters hearse was parked on the street and I’m thinking what the hell is this? Being the pre-internet era, I had no clue what is was until the movie came out many months later.
I can’t believe that was almost 40 years ago. I’m getting old. How did that happen so fast?
I’m getting old. How did that happen so fast?
“Oh my paws and whiskers!”
Was that the blog…?
The very same. The most epic attempt at a demonstration of superiority as I have ever seen. I could never figure out if I should feel sympathy or contempt toward the creature who committed so many pixels to the screen.
Priest sews lips together to protest
climate change ignorancehis need for psychiatric care.I could never figure out if I should feel sympathy or contempt…
It’s easier to feel sympathy for those who do not behave obnoxiously.
…need for psychiatric care.
Speaking of which, there is certainly no argument about the “bitch” part.
I could never figure out if I should feel sympathy or contempt toward the creature who committed so many pixels to the screen.
I always suspect HAL9000 was the author of that hot mess.
I always suspect HAL9000 was the author of that hot mess.
Strongly suspected, verging on certainty.
Speaking of which, there is certainly no argument about the “bitch” part.
Says that she is not “out” to her family, and yet posts that video.
I always suspect HAL9000 was the author of that hot mess.
No doubt about it, but look on the bright side, Steve, no longer is yours also The Avatar of Shame.
Says that she is not “out” to her family, and yet posts that video.
It depends on what is meant by “out” I suspect her family has known she is off plumb for quite a while.
Being the pre-internet era, I had no clue what is was until the movie came out many months later.
Back in ’76 or so, while a wee copy boy at a newspaper, I befriended a fellow c.e. who buttonholed me one shift and demanded that I see this new sci-fi movie that just appeared. One I had never heard about. That was “Star Wars.”
Years later, walking down main street one afternoon at my college, I passed by the theater. There was a poster showing Harrison Ford [yadda, yadda, yadda] “Raiders of the Lost Ark.”
Dam, those were wonderful experiences.
re Hal9000…he had his moments. The one that gets me to this day, and this day because this day I spent getting attacked by yellow jackets, is minnow. That vespoligist extraordinaire. Ashamed he still gets in my head but the bastard insulted my dog. Unforgivable.
is now about damn near everything else
Movies have been about ROI since forever or they wouldn’t get made at all. What changed is the way they’re consumed; the shift to home consumption meant more women with children were consuming them, so the producers shifted their focus. Which is why…
I for one have had enough of smarmy kids in every fucking movie being made
Adults watching movies with kids aren’t going to put up with kids on screen sassing adults. Kids parked in front of the TV as a babysitter love it.
Just who do you believe was that original SNL audience?
Same as it’s always been: 18-34 year old men.
The problem predates mass home consumption by at least a dozen years. I date this problem to the increasing influence of movie reviewers and the snob society that gained traction in the 1970’s. Was it here or Ace where someone commented on the waitress/diner scene in Six Easy Pieces being elitist crap? The thing about S&E that I recall was watching them for their insight but despising their (especially Ebert’s) attitudes. Way too much importance on things that distract from the story. So you get these stunning reviews for meh stuff like Grand Canyon and such. What really amuses me is how they could mockingly dismiss things like Heaven’s Gate and Ishtar then decades later turn around and gush…ok, not totally gush but YKWIM, about them.
Was it here or Ace where someone commented on the waitress/diner scene in Six Easy Pieces being elitist crap?
How about here?
the snob word
@WTP, I didn’t mean to object to your use of the term film snobs: I know they do exist and aplenty, and they’re a menace. But I don’t think there’s markedly more film snobbery than there ever was. It’s just that what used to be an individual quirk is now schooled in. People who don’t have any innate propensity for snobbery hear the gab and join in. Their voices get magnified and repeated by our media. It’s a kind of poison (not fatal, maybe, but wasting) to the culture, but the publicity echo chamber finds it useful.
Six Easy Pieces – one too many?
the waitress/diner scene
Nicholson’s character is a lot like Woody Allen’s in Annie Hall, only Bobby’s a scrapper while Alvie Singer’s a lipper. But they’ll always have anhedonia.
Look at it, when Alvie is with everyday people he whines that they aren’t interested in the deep intellectual things; but when he’s at a cocktail party crammed with intellectuals he retreats to a portable tv in the host’s bedroom and a Knicks game, which is real and those phonies out there can’t appreciate it.
Bobby, too: with his high class family, their manners and social rituals enrage him; but away from them in blue collar land, he blows up that his oil rig buddy “some redneck lives in a trailer park compare his life to mine!”
Why do his friends put up with him? What’s wrong with the movie is none of the folks he dumps on gets to grab the stick for an inning. The only one that comes near is the butch hitchhiker, and she isn’t in the picture for long.
In a way, Palm Apodaca is Bobby’s mirror image, with the difference that she seems to be amused by herself. Ideally, if I was remaking this movie, I’d have her get under his skin. So this guy who’s dissatisfied with everything wants what he can’t have. Then you’ve got a movie.
it looks like it’s going to be a terrible movie.
I’m going to politely disagree
All good points @Darleen, but the original Ghostbusters was a comedy above all else. The next generation/sequel/reboot is not. Is there an audience for (what looks like) a “Ghostbusters coming of age story”? I think not.
Bobby, too: with his high class family, their manners and social rituals enrage him; but away from them in blue collar land, he blows up that his oil rig buddy “some redneck lives in a trailer park compare his life to mine!”
Reminds me of this Stonetoss comic…
http://stonetoss.com/comic/working-clash/
In honor of Harry’s wife, Kendi is a giver. Won’t you be too ?
How about here?
I think whoever wrote what I read was rehashing this either consciously or subconsciously. I wouldn’t put it past Driscoll to rehash something he wrote 9 years ago and pretend otherwise, but that’s not being very charitable. Then again, I ain’t the Salvation Army. That piece is might close to what I remember reading however, yet not exactly it. Thanks for the effort, though.
I wouldn’t put it past Driscoll to rehash something he wrote 9 years ago and pretend otherwise, but that’s not being very charitable.
Heh.
Thanks for the effort, though.
Limited effort. I only looked at the first page or two of search results.
Steve, no longer is yours also The Avatar of Shame.
That’s true. Small blessings. Still gets under my skin though. Every once in a while I’ll get a different avatar. It makes me smile…but I’m easily pleased. You’ve got a good memory.
I used to post as HAL9000 with a quote from same after Hal had said something particularly HAL9000ish. But I’m sure people figured that out.
Small blessings.
In that category: I have been forgetting all the details of what Hal and minnow said. And if there were even earlier trolls I have forgotten even their names.
Same as it’s always been: 18-34 year old men.
I always suspected it started at 16 and tailed off after about 27. I was 16 for the first season. I’m viewing it from my own perspective, but I don’t recall too many over 30s talking about the show and doing the schticks.
I remember season 3 best. First year at Rye High. I was typing an essay at the coffee table in the basement den watching SNL when the Mississauga Train Derailment happened. I lived 2 miles from the epicentre, 750 meters as the crow flies from where the train’s hotbox came off. The essay was due on the Monday. I didn’t make it into class until Wednesday. The prof wrote “Delayed due to disaster” on the top of the paper. He was a pretty good guy.
Steve, no longer is yours also The Avatar of Shame.
By the way, I never did figure out your trick for changing avatars at will. I thought you might be using a VPN or something else that changed your IP address every time you commented.
…I never did figure out your trick for changing avatars at will.
It…
…has…
…nothing…
New Landmark: Bridge Designed by Equitable and Inclusive Mathematics Program Celebrates Grand Opening
…to do…
…with…
…IP.
Now you’re just showing off. ;p
Now you’re just showing off.
Maybe, but is also a clue…