For newcomers, three more items from the archives.
Leftwing arts establishment claims to be “suppressed,” sneers at the little people, demands free money.
Note the word “suppressed.” Like “dissent,” it’s a tad grandiose. I’m not convinced that the reduction of taxpayer subsidy for loss-making plays qualifies as “suppression.” And reluctant taxpayers please take note: Despite all the years of providing hand-outs, you’re now on the side of the oppressor. That’s gratitude for you.
Professor Thomas Thibeault points out error in sexual harassment policy and is fired two days later.
And so “exposing faculty members” to a book about public figures said to deserve the appellation “asshole” – including Bill Clinton and George Bush – can now be construed as “sexual harassment” and grounds for dismissal. Indeed, mere visibility of the book’s title may be taken as evidence of “divisiveness” and intent to oppress.
Student protestors somehow, perhaps carefully, miss the larger issue.
Some view “free” higher education as an entitlement warranting violence. But who’s going to pay for this “free” service when its value is increasingly called into question, not least by employers, many of whom point to dramatically lowered standards and ill-prepared graduates? One complaint we hear is that many students will be left with large debt (or theoretical debt) and limited prospects of a suitable job. But if so, doesn’t that call into question the value of what’s being demanded? In the UK there are currently around 20,000 students of fine art, 10,000 philosophy students and 27,000 enthusiasts of media studies. But is there a corresponding economic need? If the investment of time, effort and (other people’s) money doesn’t pay off with a lucrative and fascinating career in the private sector and a return via taxation, then how is the process justified in its present form?
And by all means wade through the greatest hits.
From the Thibeault article:
Mary Smith was explaining the sexual harassment policy and… was stating that the feelings of the offended were proof of the offensive nature of the behaviour.
Now they’ve done away with little things like evidence they can pick on anyone they like. Non leftwing professors for instance.
Result!
“Now they’ve done away with little things like evidence they can pick on anyone they like.”
If injustice is now being defined – unilaterally – by feelings (or claims of feelings), then the accusation itself is a license to act with impunity and the scope for opportunist spite is hard to overstate. Those sufficiently dishonest now have a powerful lever to use against anyone they just don’t like. It’s an invitation for vindictive abuse – based on a refusal to acknowledge that sometimes, quite often, people will lie. Even members of Designated Victim Groups.
And there are those for whom “acting persuasive and logical” is actually a sign of guilt.
Thought Id share,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZ46Ot4_lLo&feature=related
Also, looking forward to more take downs of the guardian… why do more people not get in on that action?
Terry Smith, CEO of City broking firm Tullets, says…
“The UK is as isolated as somebody who refused to join the Titanic just before it sailed “
Shiggz,
“…looking forward to more take downs of the guardian.”
You shouldn’t have to wait long. Apologies to all for the minimal posting; I’m busy working on a, um, project. Normal service should resume shortly.
No ephemera this week? Bah!
Anyway, here’s an item I think our host will appreciate.
Must’ve been the wrong kind of wind.
Must’ve been the wrong kind of wind.
At least it’s finally generating some heat and light.
From another article about the turbines:
“All staff vacate wind farms when wind speeds exceed 55mph and therefore no one was present on site at the time of this incident.”
I note with interest the second update on Where Reason Never Sleeps. I confess that at the time I wondered if FIRE was stepping in it. There was only one account offered (which was by the accused) and the claims were absurd. I thought there had to be more to the story.
Apparently there is more to the story: the administration at East Georgia College is of questionable character and revel in the absurd.