Mama, Just Killed A Man
With expectations of competent spelling:
[Professor Inoue] will lecture about “language standards that just kill our students” by subjecting them to “single standards,” which perpetuate “White language supremacy.”
You see, those composition classes you’re paying for, or that some poor sap is paying for, shouldn’t teach students how to write clearly. Instead, “compassionate” classrooms should be grounded in “dimension-based rubrics” and “labour-based contracts,” which presumably reward the length of time a student spends getting something wrong, repeatedly, irrespective of whether they actually, eventually, get it right; thereby avoiding “white racial habits of language.” It’s the path to “a socially just future,” apparently. And not, as one might suppose, somewhat narrowed hopes of employment. Because an “anti-racist” education, at a university, should ideally leave its beneficiaries sounding uneducated. With mangled conjugation, missing verbs, and saying axe instead of ask.
Professor Inoue has, of course, been mentioned here before.
Very much related, this. In which, fellow “social justice” enthusiast Dr A W Strouse informs us that correcting errors of spelling and basic grammar can “make students feel bewildered, hurt, or angry,” and should therefore be avoided. We’re also told that job applicants who, as graduates, struggle with even elementary spelling, should bristle at any acknowledgement of this shortcoming, telling potential employers – and I quote – “Fuck you.”
Update, via the comments:
Readers will note that Professors Inoue and Strouse insist that disparities in proficiency must be a result of “racism” by “bourgeois white teachers” – i.e., teachers who treat minority students like anyone else, with the same expectations and standards – while carefully omitting the influence of leftist educators, such as themselves, who choose not to impart the basics of the subject to minority students on account of their supposed delicacy, and while exulting in their own woke status. Because, somehow, that’s not racist at all.
Again, lefties project.
Lifted from a discussion following this.
It’s almost like a kidney disorder, in which the waste accumulates, poisoning the body.
Well that happens, when the media/academia/establishment is trying to force feed everyone mercury with every meal.
Ah, pogo. According to my French teacher, he had this exchange with an English teacher:
ET: The subjunctive is dead!
FT: I wish it were, for your sake.
You used “irrespective” when the spirit of the article demands the use of “irregardless”.
For shame, five shame even.
Some twenty years ago when I was studying Latin for my classics minor, the standard Wheellock book set included a small primer on English grammar. It was added to the standard set by Professor Wheelock in the early 1970’s when he bemoaned that students no longer knew enough elementary English grammar to properly study Latin grammar.
Plus ca change, plus le meme chose.
The fact that I can’t remember the Latin for that aphorism should indicate how good a classics student I was :/
Darleen,
I get emails, even from my higher-ups, where the writing skills on display leave a lot to be desired.
Try reading the copy in a real estate listing. You’ll be pulling out your hair. (O.O)
By all appearances, one need not be even barely literate to get a real estate license in California – and based on far too many of the reports I’ve reviewed, written by professional real estate appraisers, the same can be said of those, too. (>_<)
[hoping no one sees the glaring grammatical error in that last line]
Muphry’s Law in action, I reckon.
I suspect that a majority of readers of bad writing are themselves bad readers and are blissfully unaware of bad grammar, misspellings, misusages, fractured syntax. If you point out an error you risk being accused of being a “hater”, a “grammar Nazi”, or just a racist – microaggressions doncha know.
…racial inequity within the realm of bicycling
From the linked blogpost: “…(B)uffed like so much enlightening graffiti”.
That phrase says so much.
That phrase says so much.
Perhaps the ladies are hoping to sway the demographic that gets its subtle philosophies from crap sprayed on walls.
Ultima Thule: a distant unknown region; the extreme limit of travel and discovery.
I am struggling here.
It’s the path to minimum wage.
As noted in an earlier thread, our woke professors insist that standard English shouldn’t be “privileged” in class, or in academic writing, or during job interviews, as this would be “racist.” But if you’re an employer and trying to thin a pile of job applications, repeated errors of even simple grammar and spelling are, inevitably, going to be a big help in deciding which ones to ignore. Whether the professors like it or not, “alternative types of English” tend to send a message – of ignorance, carelessness, parochialism and intellectual imprecision. And if someone is apparently too distracted to proofread their own job application, that’s unlikely to inspire great confidence.
And remember, we’re talking about university students. Our brightest and best.
I am struggling here.
It is perfect geometric logic.
Ultima Thule is from Greco-Roman history, AKA Dead White Men (even if they really were a bit swarthy at times) and refers to what is now Scandinavia in general, i.e., a land filled with pasty white blond haired, blue-eyed Vikings, and we all know how violent and genocidal they were.
QED, Ultima Thule=violent white supremacist genocide.
Come on man, you have to get your Woke™ on.
Sorry, but thinning job applications by grammar checking may be seen in the USA as a pretext for discrimination if such a practice has adverse impact on a protected class. If there is adverse impact (a statistical comparison of pass rates) then the burden falls on the employer to demonstrate that the practice is a reliable measure and valid for that job in terms of job content (individuals must use proper grammar,etc. to successfully perform the job).
A slippery slope indeed, as are so many.
Sorry, but
At this rate, I suspect many of us will be.
Sorry, but
It’s a strange conceit, the notion that if you fail to impress a potential employer – say, with inept, unchecked spelling – then this is somehow the fault of the person running a business and with a hundred other things to worry about. As if it were the employer’s duty to bend over backwards and find something for you to do, at his or her expense, because you’re just so fabulous and intriguing.
I saw a milder version of something similar a while ago, while chatting with a niece’s teenage friends. There was lots of modish indignation about dress codes that frowned on outlandish piercings, hair colouring, etc. The idea that a job seeker has an imperative – and duty – to make themselves employable, rather than a needless burden to strangers, was at times met with something approaching bewilderment. As if it were an unfamiliar concept and quite puzzling.
As if having green hair and distorting your earlobes with holes the size of a two-pound coin were much more important.
…if such a practice has adverse impact on a protected class.
I’m half-convinced that this is the motivation behind our universities’ tireless efforts to maleducate the “privileged” kids. When everybody sounds like a character from Idiocracy, then there’s no need to worry about proportionate impact. Matta fix!
Rob,
Yes, Ultima Thule, as an expression, generally means a far and unknown place. The origin is in classical references to the farthest unknown northern lands.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thule
However, our linguist friend is sure that references to “Ultima Thule” should be considered references to the “Thule Society”. This was a collection of theosophical cranks in interwar Germany, complete with absurd racial theories that fascinated some of the early Nazis. I think “Thule” itself was supposed to be a mystical origin place for Germanic peoples. The society was not filled with rational or nice people.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thule_Society
However, the Thule Society is not exactly at the forefront of most peoples’ minds nowadays. Still, a suitable basis for intimating that NASA is full of crypto-Nazis, right?
The idea that a job seeker has an imperative – and duty – to make themselves employable, rather than a needless burden to strangers, was at times met with something approaching bewilderment. As if it were an unfamiliar concept and quite puzzling.
Was met with this same sense of bewilderment about 10 years ago when blogging on The Philosophers’ Magazine website. In the process of discussion a hypothetical situation arose in which I implied that a hypothetical person with neck tattoos would be suspicious in the context of a crime that had just been committed. I was met with bewilderment and more at such a suggestion. This was 10 years ago. With adults. Or perhaps I should say older people. Their adult status, aside from being teachers and great thinkers and such, was a matter of perspective. Of course I’m sure they would have said the same of me.
Was met with this same sense of bewilderment about 10 years ago
At the time, I didn’t press the point and was more interested in listening to the huffing and indignation, but I was left wondering how my parents or grandparents might have fared with a similar attitude.
At the time, I didn’t press the point and was more interested in listening
Of course those were teenagers and one could attribute much more of their bewilderment to what they have seen coming from adults in this regard and thus somewhat miming those adults as an excuse to get away with whatever the issue is at the time. When I was that age I had similar sympathies, though mostly because my parents were more strict in what we were allowed to wear to various outings. Teen logic, etc. that was generally attitudinally adjusted, if not by parents, by the loco parentis of other adults more likely to hear it, especially teachers and such, because we had some weird sixth sense, likely reinforced by…mmm…force, not to utter teen logic around our actual parents. So I don’t so much blame the kids as I do the writers at the Guardian or from whatever source kids over yonder are more likely to get their adult-justifiable stupidity. The lion’s share of the responsibility thus is lying with the adults who write such crap and the publishers/editors who sanction it whether to sell product or for some Alinsky purposes. No matter.
But along similar lines this happened on FB recently. I have a rather religious high school teammate who sometimes posts rather tiresome religious…stuff…but within that context occasionally her posts are usefully amusing. Also on FB in our intersection of friends is our old high school coach. Now this guy is someone from whom I gathered a lot of very positive adult-ish growning up, no excuses principles. I really respected this guy when I was a teenager. One of my favorite go-to no-excuses lessons he taught me was after we lost a meet due to a bad call, and we were all pissing and moaning about it, he got our attention right quick and proceeded to explain that life is going to hand you bad calls. You must build such things into your game plan. To win by a little when all goes your way is deceptive. You need to always, always press yourself such that when all the breaks are against you, you still have enough cushion to win in spite of oh fortuna. So today my teammate posts a meme that has been around a bit to wit “Heaven has walls, a gate, and a strict immigration policy. Hell has open borders. Think about it”. Now who chimes in on this but ole coach asking “How do you know this?”. I think to myself, my God WTF happened to this guy? How could the guy who taught me so much make such a douchey disingenuous comment? My point in relating all this I suppose is, WTF is wrong with people? I try hard to understand the generational eroding of logic and values and such, but for the kind of guy that that guy was to sink to such a lame level of argument of the course of an already-adult life is extremely disheartening. Forgive me for the long rant, and perhaps not knowing Coach, my little paragraph here does not convey the amount of respect I once had. Admittedly I was young, perhaps there was something there that I missed.
David – If I fail to impress an employer with misspellings and poor grammar in my resume, that is my failing. But the truth of the matter is that if enough people in a protected class similarly lose out on job prospects with an employer for the same reason, the law places the burden on the employer to prove that it is not discriminating by using the “grammar test”.
The same would apply to using attire, tattoos, or body piercings to whittle down the number of applicants for a job. Employers can have policies regarding these things for their employees, but they cannot* impose them on applicants if doing so eliminates applicants of a protected class at a greater rate than non-protected.
* Well, you can, but be careful. If you know that a practice has adverse impact you had better prepare for the possible consequences. If you don’t know, your ignorance is not a defense.
protected class
There’s your problem.
Unemployment in my region is below three percent. Given the performance of various cashiers, waiters, snow-removal specialists, and automotive service technicians that I’ve had the pleasure of interacting with this winter, I’d say that bad grammar and neck tattoos aren’t the impediment to employment one might think they should be.
I’m pretty sure that the kid who wiped down my table a few months ago is now the shift manager, if only because he shows up when scheduled and he doesn’t steal too much from the establishment. Hell, it’s gotten to the point that employers are actually willing to look at furloughed federal employees as potential new hires!
“How do you know this?”
Who wants to sneak into Hell?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jun/07/invasion-urban-foxes
David, it’s a good thing you have the flamethrower! You might need it. (“Hey, Half! Get on the phone and see if anyone wants to come over for grilled fox—tell them we’re sorry about the short notice, but it just now attacked me…”)
I must say I was shocked to read this. I don’t think there’s any record of an American being attacked by a fox unless it (the fox) was rabid. Maybe the British foxes are getting even for all those centuries of fox-hunting?
Squid, ex-Feds with security clearances are always in demand. A high-level clearance is a license to print money.
test
(trying out an old [2011] laptop my brother got working again)
Farnsworth, there is a history :
“Nicaragua’s press censor is Lieut. Nelba Blandon, a 24-year-old lawyer whose wit and intelligence serve to soften the image given by the military uniform she wears to work and the pistol she carries on her hip.”
–the New York Times describing the Sandinista’s gun toting military censor of the press.
http://www.nytimes.com/1983/11/21/world/nicaragua-loosens-the-reins-on-opposition-paper.html
https://colmilquetoast.blogspot.com/2016/03/how-orwellian-censor-censoring-censor.html
A high-level clearance is a license to print money.
Indeed. Hence the squealing we heard when Trump started rescinding the clearances of officials from the previous administration.
“Otoh, one of the English teacher was nabbed for hosting overnights with girls on his small yacht.”
Hhhmmm, York House? And he ‘eloped’ with the head girl? I may know of whom you speak. I had him for English when he taught in Toronto, before moving to Vancouver. Iirc, he was the headmaster, too.
‘Fick you’