Related Posts
Recent Comments
SEARCH
Archives
Interesting Sites
Categories
- Academia
- Agonies of the Left
- AI
- And Then It Caught Fire
- Anthropology
- Architecture
- Armed Forces
- Arse-Chafing Tedium
- Art
- Auto-Erotic Radicalism
- Basking
- Bees
- Behold My Massive Breasts
- Behold My Massive Lobes
- Beware the Brown Rain
- Big Hooped Earrings
- Bionic Lingerie
- Blogs
- Books
- Bra Drama
- Bra Hygiene
- Cannabis
- Classic Sentences
- Collective Toilet Management
- Comics
- Culture
- Current Affairs
- Dating Decisions
- Dental Hygiene's Racial Subtext
- Department of Irony
- Dickensian Woes
- Did You Not See My Earrings?
- Emotional Support Guinea Pigs
- Emotional Support Water Bottles
- Engineering
- Ephemera
- Erotic Pottery
- Farmyard Erotica
- Feats
- Feminist Comedy
- Feminist Dating
- Feminist Fun Times
- Feminist Poetry Slam
- Feminist Pornography
- Feminist Snow Ploughing
- Feminist Witchcraft
- Film
- Food and Drink
- Free-For-All
- Games
- Gardening's Racial Subtext
- Gentrification
- Giant Vaginas
- Great Hustles of Our Time
- Greatest Hits
- Hair
- His Pretty Nails
- History
- Housekeeping
- Hubris Meets Nemesis
- Ideas
- If You Build It
- Imagination Must Be Punished
- Inadequate Towels
- Indignant Replies
- Interviews
- Intimate Waxing
- Juxtapositions
- Media
- Mischief
- Modern Savagery
- Music
- Niche Pornography
- Not Often Seen
- Oppressive Towels
- Parenting
- Policing
- Political Nipples
- Politics
- Postmodernism
- Pregnancy
- Presidential Genitals
- Problematic Acceptance
- Problematic Baby Bouncing
- Problematic Bookshelves
- Problematic Bra Marketing
- Problematic Checkout Assistants
- Problematic Civility
- Problematic Cleaning
- Problematic Competence
- Problematic Crosswords
- Problematic Cycling
- Problematic Fairness
- Problematic Fitness
- Problematic Furniture
- Problematic Height
- Problematic Monkeys
- Problematic Motion
- Problematic Neighbourliness
- Problematic Ownership
- Problematic Parties
- Problematic Pasta
- Problematic Plumbers
- Problematic Punctuality
- Problematic Questions
- Problematic Reproduction
- Problematic Taxidermy
- Problematic Toilets
- Problematic Walking
- Problematic Wedding Photos
- Pronouns Or Else
- Psychodrama
- Radical Bowel Movements
- Radical Bra Abandonment
- Radical Ceramics
- Radical Dirt Relocation
- Reheated
- Religion
- Reversed GIFs
- Science
- Shakedowns
- Some Fraction Of A Sausage
- Sports
- Stalking Mishaps
- Student Narcolepsy
- Suburban Polygamist Ninjas
- Suburbia
- Technology
- Television
- The Deep Wisdom of Celebrities
- The Genitals Of Tomorrow
- The Gods, They Mock Us
- The Great Outdoors
- The Politics of Buttocks
- The Thrill Of Endless Noise
- The Thrill of Friction
- The Thrill of Garbage
- The Thrill Of Glitter
- The Thrill of Hand Dryers
- The Thrill of Medicine
- The Thrill Of Powdered Cheese
- The Thrill Of Seating
- The Thrill Of Shopping
- The Thrill Of Toes
- The Thrill Of Unemployment
- The Thrill of Wind
- The Thrill Of Woke Retailing
- The Thrill of Yarn
- The Year That Was
- Those Lying Bastards
- Those Poor Darling Armed Robbers
- Those Poor Darling Burglars
- Those Poor Darling Carjackers
- Those Poor Darling Fare Dodgers
- Those Poor Darling Looters
- Those Poor Darling Muggers
- Those Poor Darling Paedophiles
- Those Poor Darling Sex Offenders
- Those Poor Darling Shoplifters
- Those Poor Darling Stabby Types
- Those Poor Darling Thieves
- Tomorrow’s Products Today
- Toys
- Travel
- Tree Licking
- TV
- Uncategorized
- Unreturnable Crutches
- Wigs
- You Can't Afford My Radical Life
A wing and a prayer!
I was also surprised by the undulation of the runway.
Still, one problem at a time.
Holy crap. Where was this filmed?
Where was this filmed?
I think it’s Birmingham Airport, which, I’ve just been told, has an undulating runway
built at right angles to the prevailing wind direction.BHX is Birmingham, UK.
Thanks.
*note to self: avoid Birmingham airport*
It looks worse than it is because of the extreme foreshortening caused by what must be an enormous zoom lens
I think it’s Birmingham Airport, which, I’ve just been told, has an undulating runway built at right angles to the prevailing wind direction.
Not really. The runway is 15/33 (33 if departing or approaching to the north, 15 to the south), so the runway runs nearly north to south (150°-330°).
The videos were made during Storm Doris which had gusts >73mph, and the prevailing winds during the storm were generally west-east over England.
As far as the undulation goes, the highest point is at the runway 33 threshold at 328 feet, generally downward a total of 25 feet toward the runway 15 threshold, The total length of the runway is 10,000+ feet.
25 feet over 10,000 doesn’t allow for much undulation, but the foreshortening of a long focal length lens does.
Whatever those pilots get paid, they deserve a raise.
Not really
Ah, thanks.
Shame we can’t see what’s going on inside.
Shame we can’t see what’s going on inside.
Ah, thanks.
The least I could do to make up for my Four Scolds of last week.
Besides, if you acquired a Birminghamophobia, you might miss out on travelling to Birmingham, Alabama, where you can marvel at the moonrise at the statue of Vulcan.
We who are about to fly salute you.
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/star-wars-star-trek-argument-ends-assault-arrest/story?id=48501161&cid=clicksource_4380645_7_hero_headlines_headlines_hed
Meanwhile, in Hamburg, an outbreak of socialism.
I love these bumpy take-off and landing videos,especially with the extreme foreshortening that makes the planes look like they are wobbling in place and make the runways look as undulating as a strip fried bacon.
Shame we can’t see what’s going on inside.
On the bright side, nor can we smell what’s going on inside.
This stuff looks scary as hell, but it doesn’t worry me. Professional pilots have to master cross-wind landing, and they have the option to go around when it’s too dicey.
What really scares me is pilots who have spent their entire careers relying on automation finding themselves in an in unfamiliar situation, see: http://www.vanityfair.com/news/business/2014/10/air-france-flight-447-crash
This is why my mother was happy when my father retired.
Also: Dad once owned a Cessna 195, which is a large taildragger with a 7 cylinder radial engine. This plane has “crosswind” landing gear, which means that the mains can caster right or left, so you can actually have as much as 20 degrees difference between your taxi heading and course. Great for landing in crosswinds, since you don’t have to kick the plane to align with the runway at touchdown. Also great for puzzling ground control, who’d occasionally call us while we were taxiing “sideways” to ask if we had a problem.
The B-52 bomber also has crosswind gear, but that’s a whole different can of avgas.
Also: in the 60s, Dad spent a couple years helping test anti-hydroplaning systems for airplanes and runways. This included testing various tire tread patterns and runway grooving patterns. His responsibility was to fly the actual full-scale tests onto flooded or snowy runways. Somewhere I have a video of the CV-990 tests (CV-990 is about the same as a Boeing 707). A NASA facility on the US east coast has a raised rim around it so it can be flooded with an inch of water. The videos show this large jet approaching smoothly, then at touchdown everything aft of the nose disappears in a huge cloud of spray, while the fuselage wanders and dances side-to-side. I thought these videos were vastly amusing, but Mom did not, for some reason.
Lachlan is right about options, of course. Regular passenger operations have to be able to attempt and miss an approach, fly to a pre-planned alternate airport, and still have (I don’t remember how much) extra gas. I’m sure the numbers are in FAR Part 121 somewhere, for the US anyway.
But if there’s an enormous area-wide storm, the landings in the videos might be the best option. Or maybe they were just out of gas.
Options: My father once circled over Bodo, Norway, for about an hour, while the slushy runway froze solid. Rough ice gives better braking action than slush. But that was not a passenger flight.
I don’t see the problem. The UK’s new “Wriggly Wrunway” program makes things more fun!
All you cishets bigots assuming all runways are straight and flat! Celebrate runway diversity!
Hey, I’m cishet, and I LIKE curves. And bumps.
I always found getting caught in turbulance the most interesting part of a plane journey!
[ Sets blog to juddering mode. ]
That’s better.
We have a similar problem here in the US&A with low level turbulence.
Not to mention crosswind parking.
Meanwhile, in Hamburg, an outbreak of socialism.
Ah, but it’s not real socialism, is it?
I took the time to figure out how to embed images here. I am now going to spend the rest of the day acting all snooty.
I took the time to figure out how to embed images here.
Personal growth.
Personal growth.
Before:
After:
He’s drunk with power. Fetch the sedatives.
I for one appreciate Farnsworth M Muldoon explaining the apparent undulations at Birmingham. Unfortunately feminists don’t appreciate his mansplaining:
Real men don’t go around.
He’s drunk with power. Fetch the sedatives.
Here y’are: Just watch the shiny pill, ftumch, watch it very closely . . . .
Unfortunately feminists don’t appreciate his mansplaining
It’s not much of a genocidio if we can still hear them bitching.
Real men don’t go around.
OTOH, they and their passengers have some fine memorial ceremonies.
For those of you who think flying airliners is nothing more than knowing which buttons to push, when, autoland would have been worse than useless in those conditions.