Jim Goad on the “microaggressions” hustle:
That’s what’s ultimately dangerous about this concept of “microaggresions” — even the demented fanatics who insist that such things actually exist will concede that the perpetrator may not harbour or exhibit any malice whatsoever… Under this framework, bigotry is solely in the eyes of the accuser. No matter how pleasant your demeanour or how generously you act, you can still be bludgeoned over the head with baseless accusations of unconscious racism, and your accuser will feel like a good person for doing it.
And no vain, vindictive soul would ever exploit that kind of leverage for purposes of their own, would they?
David French on academia’s racial quotas and ideological cleansing:
If Americans broadly understood how the process works, support for affirmative action would diminish even further. First, few people understand how dramatic the boost is for favoured minority groups. If students were black or the ‘right’ kind of Latino, they would often receive admissions offers with test scores 20 or 30 percentile points lower than those of white or Asian students. When I expressed concern about an admissions offer to a black student with test scores in the 70th percentile — after we’d passed over white and Asian students with scores in the 98th percentile and far higher grades — I was told that we had to offer admission or we’d surely lose him to our Ivy League rivals. Second, these dramatic breaks rarely go to poor kids who are overcoming the challenges of ghetto schools.
And Tim Blair and Andrew Bolt have been mining the naked cronyism and deep comedy of Australia’s taxpayer-funded art world:
The finest grant of them all occurred in 2011, when Sydney artist Denis Beaubois received $20,000 from the Australia Council. Beaubois simply piled the cash into two stacks, put a glass box around it and called the resultant piece Currency. The arts grant and the art were one and the same. Then he put the money up for sale at an auction – where someone actually paid $21,350 to buy $20,000. ‘’The money I make will be used to finance part two of the project, which is a series of performance/video works on the division of labour, and capitalism,’’ Beaubois said. There is a much easier way for Beaubois and all Australian artists to study capitalism, and that is by participating in it. The Australia Council should be shut down, along with just about all arts funding. This would save close to $700 million per year and – absolutely guaranteed – would result in better art.
Artists making things that customers might like and wish to pay for directly, voluntarily? Why, the very idea.
Feel free to share your own links and snippets in the comments. It’s what these posts are for.
Oh, my, David, that podcast is HILAR!
Totes HILAR, as I believe the cool kids say. More on that here.
More on the cup – Ben Eltham in defense of the polystyrene cup.
http://beneltham.info/that-time-tim-blair-appeared-at-my-arts-festival/
“The first one is Song: the story of a girl, a bird and a teapot. It’s a one-woman show by Waiata Telfer. The show has toured nationally and will be presented in 2015 by the Brisbane Powerhouse.
I’m sure Blair doesn’t care about any of this, but Waiata Telfer is an artist of real craft who has a considerable track record. Telfer has worked at SBS TV and the Adelaide Festival. In 1998 she won a fellowship to write and direct her own short film. She has performed at the London International Festival of Theatre and has won prizes, including the South Australian NAIDOC 2003 artist of the year. Song was developed with the help of Sue Rider, one of Australia’s better known stage directors, a multi-award winner who was director of La Boite for eight years in the 1990s.”
She may have a track record, but its a stupid exhibit and unworthy of my and other taxpayers money. The work should be judged on its (lack of) merits, not on the back of their previous work of unknown worth.
“I’m wagering Tim Blair knows none of this. He doesn’t even appear to know the name of the show (it doesn’t appear in his blog post, which Andrew Bolt has reposted).
Tim Blair has failed to discover the name of the show. He can’t even tell us the name of the artist. He doesn’t know even elementary details about her background. ”
Seeing a crap piece of art doesn’t require me to know the background of the artist, their dog or their favourite handbag to know that it’s not worth the polystyrene its made of.
“I would have thought you’d need to know that kind of thing if you wanted to ridicule someone’s work in a national newspaper.”
Nope.It’s that bad that context is unnecessary. The end.
“Does Waiata Telfer deserve such ridicule? No, of course she doesn’t…”
Yes, yes she does. Otherwise how will she and others learn that this stuff isn’t worth a taxpayers dollar, let alone thousands of them?
“