Friday Ephemera
At last, a paper calculator. // Starring the computer. As seen in film and television. // Fun with grammar. // Flexils, like pencils but flexible. // Hippo table of note. // Hamster Mario. // The horsemen of Semonkong. (h/t, Coudal) // On the origins of Dick. // Arthur C Clarke reads extracts from 2001: A Space Odyssey. // Ruben really likes his job. // No, you fool. The other red one. // At last, your very own remote-controlled tugboat. // In 120 years, sprinters have gotten faster. (h/t, Things) // Tall and twisted buildings. // Well, it’s one way to do it, I suppose. // Umwelt. // Visiting cousin. // Shadow sculptures of note. // Sshh. Don’t tell them. (h/t, Ace) // Hornet turban. // Sliding doors of note. // Caterpillar excursion, Perth. // And finally, a near-perfect display of crashing very slowly.
Fun with grammar.
“On the sentence”?
And technically, isn’t it syntax and not grammar?
(I know, I know. No refunds; credit note only.)
Summon the henchlesbians Ted’s getting all uppity!
https://twitter.com/swear_trek/status/768835349447606272
The longest word in English, indirectly via this.
The caterpillars marching in a circle, nose-to-tail, for a week, somehow reminds me of contemporary Higher Education.
The longest word in English, indirectly via this.
It’s not English.
How do we know? Well, that’s also what it is called in every other language in the world too. It’s no more a word that a long computer program printed out makes a “book”.
I once worked in a patent office, and “words” like this were commonplace. It wasn’t even remotely unusual to have a “word” take five or six lines of text. Worse, I often could work out the actual formula from a “word” that long, I got so used to them. It’s a very specialised skill, and not much in demand.
The really bizarre thing about the chemical patents was not the long chemical names, it was the sentence lengths. There used to be a guideline that every claim in a US patent should only be one sentence. Once when “reading” a patent (probably about some surfactant) I though to myself — “Chester, when did you last see a full stop?”. A bit of checking revealed that the sentence was 52 pages of text long.
Well, it’s one way to do it, I suppose.
A lot of set-up to not much effect.
A lot of set-up to not much effect.
Absolutely. It’s the latest in a series of art that wasn’t worth making. I suppose it’s what happens when you’re desperate to think of another novelty, another angle, another excuse for self-flattering verbiage, but you don’t have much actual, you know, talent. Unlike the people who designed the robots.
And if you want to an “intersection” of art, performance and robotics, others have done it much better.
Arthur C Clarke reads extracts from 2001: A Space Odyssey.
It’s funny how the word ‘space’, as used above, really dates science fiction, rather like how in Star Trek the crew refers to “space dock,” rather than just “dock” or “dry dock.”
It’s a bit like referring to the ship’s décor and furnishings as “space carpet” and “space curtains.”
There’s something rather comforting about that airship crash.
‘Nobody was hurt, but one passenger spilled champagne on his trousers.’
I’m glad to see the New York Times acknowledging Harambes influence on all our lives.
Airlander, or per Iowahawk, Kardashian One.
“reminds me of contemporary Higher Education”: contemporary with what, Fred?
The Starbucks van in the “sliding doors” link perfectly expresses my feelings about Starbucks coffee. Burned beans and overpriced.
Hippo table of note.
Don’t know if it’s art but I do like it.
Well, it’s one way to do it, I suppose.
If the robot is more interesting than the painting you’re doing something wrong.
we see a huge hornet nest atop a statue that has a striking resemblance to a turban.
I’m not seeing it. That statue doesn’t look anything like a turban.
@Jabrwok
*golf clap*
@R. Sherman: Thank’ee kindly good sir:-).
Moving on, I wonder if this woman would qualify for a Performing Arts grant?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3759302/Woman-releases-tub-live-crickets-worms-New-York-subway.html
If the robot is more interesting than the painting you’re doing something wrong.
“Yes, Mr Ilić, the robot arm that you hired – which was designed and built by people who aren’t you – is very impressive. But even after grafting on all this robotic drama, your painting still looks like shockingly inept window cleaning.”
But even after grafting on all this robotic drama, your painting still looks like shockingly inept window cleaning.
So much of modern art commentary–usually provided by the “artists” themselves–seems to devolve into those sort of pretentious reviews of wine: “A flirtatious, yet innocent bouquet which invokes memories of a summer in Tuscany combined with sweaty jock-straps. Dry as a summer in Dafur during the recent sectarian strife. Ten quid at Tesco.”
The Airlander idea has been around for a long time. Check out the article by John McPhee “The Deltoid Pumpkin Seed” which must be from the 70s. Smaller, but with the “sometimes crashes” feature in common.
Btw I unreservedly recommend anything by McPhee. In light of recent event in Louisiana, let me suggest his “Atchafalaya”.
And to think he used to write for the New Yorker…
Sorry about the (image) size.
In 120 years, sprinters have gotten faster.
Equipment has palyed a part in that. Here’s an interesting comparison between Jesse Owens’ 1936 100 meters in Berlin and a modern sprinter (Canada’s bronze medalist Andre De Grasse). Owens’ 10.3 looks even more impressive in retrospect.
Nobody was hurt, but one passenger spilled champagne on his trousers.
Oh, the humanity.
**played a part**
For a moment, I thought that sprinter comparison link had already been posted here (maybe it was, but I can’t find it). Anyway, in De Grasse’s defense, the track he was running on was not that good, compared to the cinder tracks that were used in Owens’ day. It looks like the red clay track we had at my high school back in the 1970s.
What media bias?
https://youtu.be/Ra8NA3gb_lI
What media bias?
Heh.
Starring The Computer does appear to need a great deal of development to reach the lofty archival heights of the Internet Movie Firearms Database or the Internet Movie Firearms Database. Both are excellent in their topics of choice.
Sorry, meant “Movie Cars Database”.
What media bias
Shorter Joel Stein: “I wrote it that way because I’m too lazy to look beyond the squeakiest wheel.”
That is almost literally what he says in the interview.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-JRVBBBvQBLE/Udy4dwT483I/AAAAAAAAAFo/UsK4UojkRi0/s640/journalismorwell.jpg
I wrote it that way because I’m too lazy to look beyond the squeakiest wheel.
That’s his excuse. He wrote it that way because he doesn’t think that there’s anything wrong with calling Sarah Palin a cunt, but God forbid somebody dare call a feminist a bitch.
I once worked in a patent office, and “words” like this were commonplace. It wasn’t even remotely unusual to have a “word” take five or six lines of text. Worse, I often could work out the actual formula from a “word” that long, I got so used to them. It’s a very specialised skill, and not much in demand.
Love it. Incidentally, the video in the second link with the live reading of the word in question seems to be heavily accented, as if the guy is – I dunno, Russian? In English it would surely be pronounced rather differently.
An early entry in the longest word competition. Some day I will memorise it all and then put it on my CV; the employers will be throwing themselves at my feet…. :p
Hedgehog, of course you are right.
It’s like the operating principle of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation: The thrill you get from overcoming the superficial design defects completely blinds you to the fundamental design defects.
I was surprised that Stein was unable to come up with a plausible rationale, especially since he knew going in that Milo was going to dig at him. So I was blinded by his admission of laziness and poor journalism, and forgot his fundamental motivation.
Like fat crabs in a bucket. In the world of competitive fat victimhood, having any redeeming features — like, say, being “conventionally pretty”, or merely being Rubenesque as compared to Jabbaesque — can and will be used against you when convenient.
Re: McPhee, I like
-The Curve Of Binding Energy (how to build your own A-bomb: interviews with Ted Taylor, a principle fission bomb designer for the US DoE)
-The Control of Nature (3 essays: Atchafalaya (Mississippi River floods), Cooling the Lava (the saving of Heimaey in Iceland), and something about fires and mudslides in S. California)
-Rising From the Plains (The Wyoming one of his geology series. Others include In Suspect Terrain, Basin and Range, and Assembling California)
– A Sense Of Where You Are (interviews with Senator Bill Bradley, former NBA player)
– The Crofter and the Laird (Scotland)
All should be available separately or in collections.
Read the reviews.
and to tie that blatant plug back into the conversation, in “Cooling The Lava” we learn the Icelandic phrase for what a guy does when he’s working on the still-hot lava but has had one too many cups of coffee: Pissa a hraunid.
Also used by the scoffers to describe the whole lava-stopping effort.
Fred the Fourth: The thrill you get from overcoming the superficial design defects completely blinds you to the fundamental design defects.
I like that. It sounds a bit like what goes on where I work.
What media bias?
” They get more upset.”
With the unspoken implication that conservative women should just suck it up.
Meanwhile in Canada, speaking of things that fly, yet another SJW moonbat, a PhD candidate in political “science”, you will be shocked to learn, wants to ban annual airshow.
Aside from the dubious contention that an airshow, part of which is a commemoration of the 75th anniversary of the flight training plan that helped end WWII, is “trauma”, I am sure he took a vote.
I would wager this is like the Pauline Kael quote about not knowing anyone on the Upper West Side who voted for Nixon. “Days on end” = 3. The area of the airshow is over Lake Ontario. The only part of the city that gets over flown is the – wait for it – approach to runways 33L&R at the Toronto Pearson International Airport, so I doubt this is going to be particularly louder than any other day.
“Take up the white man’s burden…”, because all the brownish “refugees” are delicate things who need your beneficent guiding hand.
So why can’t this lot learn and adapt to an airshow which, if the actual majority of Torontonians didn’t want, wouldn’t happen ?
Of course that would ruin his moral preening, so we must just Ban All The Things.
In a city with a large population of refugee newcomers and people who have experienced the trauma of war it is insulting, invasive, and violent…
If that’s his concern he should look to ban Toyota pickups and aviator shades rather than air shows. I don’t think this clot knows what wars in the developing world look like.
Host societies aren’t expected to fundamentally change to serve a minority group.
That’s the obligatory and utterly meaningless disclaimer that SJWs append to every one of their statements to lull the citizenry into believing that the changes to society they are contemplating and advocating won’t make the society materially different. Meanwhile we have creeping sharia all over the developed world, we have no-go zones in many Western cities, we have women, even non-Moslem, who wear the hijab to avoid being assaulted in some parts of these cities, we have honor killings, rape gangs, and on and on. But don’t worry, for you rubes out there, host societies aren’t expected to fundamentally change to serve a minority group®.
Thank God Germany is confronting the problem head-on. Although I think Texas’s approach may be superior.
If that’s his concern he should look to ban Toyota pickups and aviator shades rather than air shows.
Don’t forget the Camrys, the VBIED vehicle of choice.
I don’t think this clot knows what wars in the developing world look like.
I doubt he knows anything even vaguely about any kind of war, according to the list of performers, unless they have something else in the surprise acts, the only planes there that are actually capable of dropping bombs or firing any other kind of ordnance are the F-18s. Not that a Beech 18 in WWII Canadian colors and a Bellanca towing a Schweitzer glider aren’t violent, or traumatic, or both. I forget which.
Canada’s icons of the air, the Canadian Forces Snowbirds will perform their dazzling display of high-speed, formation aerobatics. The team’s amazing aerial artistry will leave you glowing with patriotic pride!
Patriotic pride ? Mustn’t have that antiquated, regressive, and morally repugnant nonsense, xe said with a sneer and a spit.
“Host societies aren’t expected to fundamentally change to serve a minority group.”
I wonder how the whole transgender bathroom hysteria from a couple months back fits into this?
“Glorification of the tools of war is antiquated, regressive, and morally repugnant.”
Sounds like boilerplate agitprop straight out of a Soviet-era handbook for war protesting speeches in the west.
Mustn’t have that antiquated, regressive, and morally repugnant nonsense
Yep.
Has that sniveling twerp Craig Damian Smith ever spoken to an actual “refugee”, ever? Or is this just another special snowflake projecting xer own neuroses onto others?
Mark Steyn once quipped that the Lumberjack Song accurately described the evolution of Canadian society since the end of the Second World War.
Don’t get me wrong, I am a military son and I associated with Marine, Navy, and NASA pilots all my life. But.
I recall watching some of the practice for the airshow at Moffett Naval Air Station (Mountain View, CA) back in about ’84. The Navy Blue Angels were there, in those days flying A-4s. As it happened my house was right under the approach to Moffett, and I got on the roof to watch. For some of the runs, an A-4 would make a 45 degree descent, then level off for a fast low pass over the runway. They actually seemed to be using my house as the aim point for the descents. It was a very VERY intense experience to see and hear them screaming down right at me at 300kts.
I remarked to my girlfriend that I hoped there weren’t any Vietnamese watching in the area because of the flashback-inducing quality of the experience. (Silicon Valley has enough Vietnamese that San Jose has its own “Little Saigon” district.)
I am on the side of those who say that seeing and appreciating the qualities of our military is a Good Thing, and is part of immigrants assimilating to the culture, which is also a Good Thing.
The Canadian Snowbirds are excellent. Not as noisy or panic-inducing as the T-birds or Blue Angels, but their routines are a demo of truly amazing piloting skill and teamwork. Worth a Trip, as the travel guides say.
Lovely people.