The Walking Unwomanly
Or, Angry Man Is Angry.
With Hallowe’en approaching, I thought I’d lift this from the comments:
World’s number 1 Harry Potter fan. https://t.co/uo4pz7GAl9
— Gay Not Queer (@Gaynotqueer1) October 26, 2026
Lest it be unclear, J. K. Rowling doesn’t in fact “pass anti-trans legislation.” She isn’t funding “genocide.” She’s not “murdering” anyone, except perhaps rhetorically, and she’s not “killing children.”
And you’re not a woman, sir.
Regarding the impassioned scene above, Clam asked,
Well, indeed. Our cross-dressing chappie, the one barking instructions, is not, I fear, making a compelling case. Or eliciting anything approaching sympathy.
He’s just a man with mood-control issues who casually tells lies about others and himself, and who evidently likes to scold his imagined audience for daring to have priorities of their own, even down to what kind of Hallowe’en costume he thinks they should be allowed to wear.
The lippy doesn’t hide his fundamental obnoxiousness.
So, in that sense, he has made himself “abundantly fucking clear.” Though he doesn’t seem to realise exactly what has been revealed.
To some extent, I think he and other maladjusted bullies exploit the assumption that you should want to be, and want to be seen to be, friends with everyone. In solidarity with everything. At least everything fashionable. As if that would be possible. Which is rather silly.





I made the front page.
Groupies and acclaim are sure to follow.
And regarding those supposed “human rights” that are allegedly being crushed, this seems apposite:
The above is in reply to the claims of another bedlamite cross-dresser and castration-porn enthusiast.
It’s amazing how so few of these men make any attempt to appear womanly. If you believe you’re really a woman trapped in a man’s body, shouldn’t you try to look like the woman you believe you are? Granted, men are, well, men, so the reality is that’s pretty much out of the question.
These are merely transvestites, wanna be drag queens, or, dare I say it, posers. At worst, they’re misogynists who enjoy making a mockery of what it means to be a woman.
I seriously doubt many of these types are willing to put their money where there junk is and get their fun sticks mutilated.
For the sissy-porn-addled contingent, which is a large chunk of the broader phenomenon, there’s an inherent problem.
Those that go all-in, as it were, and who have their genitals mutilated into some grotesque approximation of the opposite sex, thereby achieving their fantasy ideal, subsequently discover – one might say belatedly – that their sexual function has been destroyed by the endeavour. And any prospect of satisfaction is rendered very much, and quite decisively, out of reach.
But we mustn’t mention the mental health issues. That would be beastly and mean.
AGPs.
It’s a fetish.
A narcissistic fetish.
Hence the nastiness in demanding fealty.
While typing this out, a song, unbidden, popped into my head.
I think my subconscious has a sense of humour. Not saying it’s good, mind, but it’s definitely there.
Just going to leave this here.
No reason.