Our Betters Make Plans
Attention, comrades. My fellow heroes, titans, thinkers of deep thoughts. It is time to map out the world of tomorrow:
There are no post revolution theatre troops, only post revolution mine troops, comrade. pic.twitter.com/ACIref7r9r
— Hegel Borg™️ (@xxclusionary) June 10, 2024
Because after the revolution, we will need accessible theatre.
Presumably, to take our minds off all the riots and ruin and burning cars. Earlier revolutionary rumblings can be found here and here. Topics covered include the pivotal importance of “artists and visionaries,” and the righteous washing of other people’s bin contents. Thereby enabling us to “eat from a revolutionary and resistance standpoint.”
Consider this an open thread. Share ye links and bicker.
I just assumed that both these communist freaks were using some kind of tiktok filtering technology. I pictured them both sitting at their desks wearing shirts and ties and looking like decent regular human beings while putting the video together and giggling.
Meanwhile. Outside. The squirrels quietly gathered.
I raised the anti-squirrel cone by four inches and foiled Blackie
Blackie’s wingman, the equally clever Earl (Earl Grey), is acting suspiciously. He’s standing under the feeder staring straight up. I suspect he is doing mental squirrel trigonometry in preparation for the next assault.
I just assumed that both these communist freaks were using some kind of tiktok filtering technology.
I was getting the Optimus Prime vibe.
Universalising university hasn’t been the benison it was presented as.
Our betters: the statement that “there is some concern about rising crime” is stated as if someone was merely “concerned” and not afraid to go downtown anymore or go out at night or had been mugged. Like it was an abstract unreasonable fear. No you shit, people are terrified. Shops are closing due to shoplifting, even Target and Walmart.
Next new thing: trans-cats
there have always been nutters. Some of them were communists who destroyed countries. But lots were just harmless….until the internet allowed them to get praise and friends for being nuts. Shame, having been banished, no longer inhibits people from showing just how nuts they are.
I suspect he is doing mental squirrel trigonometry in preparation for the next assault
Is SLERA an option?
I was getting the Optimus Prime vibe
That’s a cruel thing to do to Peter Cullen.
For those unaware, Cullen patterned the voice and personality of Optimus Prime after his older brother, a Vietnam marine veteran who had clearly seen some shit.
Is SLERA an option?
Not sure about SLERA, but I love to give one of these a go.
Note that the two black men nod in agreement as she spouts her evil.
I wonder if anyone has pointed out to them that denouncing fear of crime as racist is an admission that criminality is a part of being black. What the KKK said decades ago is now said by black radicals.
Why do all the self-styled revolutionaries assume that:
I wonder what would happen if you asked ’em?
She, (totes assuming her gender here) should be aware that after a real revolution there are always some who will think… well she’s well marbled and bets she’d be a tasty treat who’d scarcely put up a fight. Recall after the Sarajevo affair how the trees were all cut down for 50 miles away for a reason… nobody talks about that much though it’s best to always have a plan to be able to eat everyone around you. Just a heads up, not a promise.
Laugh, people, laugh. Go ahead. But they laughed at Jabba the Hutt, too, and he rose to be a galactic crime lord!
Sorry, but when it comes to foiling squirrels, nobody beats Mark Rober.
It should scarcely need saying, but the people who are making voters “afraid of crime” are the criminals themselves. The very people that our County Attorney, Ms Moriarty, is so eager to excuse and flatter, and so eager to depict as the victims of the dramas that they, themselves, create, over and over again.
And this evasion, and inversion, is the high-status view, the progressive view. And so she mouths it. Because her social status matters much more than the wellbeing, even the lives, of the actual victims – and future victims – of the creatures she excuses. And when you’re chasing status among the pretentious, invoking “white supremacy” and other imaginary phenomena is the way to go.
And our County Attorney complains about the use of the word predator – when referring to people who prey on others, violently, over and over again. As if a realistic descriptor were much too mean to those tender darlings who repeatedly violate and terrify others and who exult in doing so. Seemingly with impunity.
It’s an absurd position, utterly unrealistic, and morally degenerate. As Wanye Burkett says, “You need these people as far from the levers as possible.”
Which in turn calls to mind the London riots of 2011, during which Laurie Penny used her platform on the BBC’s World Tonight to complain, pretentiously and at length, about the use of the term feral to describe thugs and looters who were mugging children, brutalising firefighters, and setting fire to people’s homes, seemingly for entertainment, and resulting in scenes such as this:
As if the creatures doing this, often while laughing, might have their feelings hurt.
The same, sick dance.
Regarding Ms Moriarty and her practised evasions, this comes to mind:
Via Instapundit.
And this thing here seems not entirely unrelated.
In my experience, progressives are likely to take their moral cues from fictions and fantasies – whether that be Star Wars or the grotesque sainthood of George Floyd.
That. But they think *they’re* the good guys…
Well, if you’re talking about a contentious issue with someone who is chiefly concerned about how a point of view or statement of fact will impact their social standing, their position within some peer-group, then appeals to facts and logic will likely fail. You may manage to irritate them, or make them resentful, but the chances of a significant and lasting amendment of their status-conferring position seem… slim.
It’s an entirely different, and incompatible, decision-making process.
Seemingly with impunity.
“I just wanna say aaaaaaahhh!“
I laughed and I’m not sorry. They belong in landfill.
They belong in landfill.
Indeed, and these dirtbags having earlier attacked a rabbi, a vice chancellor, a guard, and an alleged journalist, the faculty takes a strong stance that will no doubt end the violence and bring peace to both the campus and Gaza.
When they build that ‘B’ Ark, it’s going to need a hell of a lot of thrust to get off the ground….
The bad guys are using the stupid as tools…
-Dietrich Bonhoeffer
As Instapundit often quips, “Maybe letting the enemies of our civilisation teach our children was a mistake.”
So. Much. That.
When will the hateful hate end!?
In West Virginia, also down in Florida, both red states, of course.
From what I can make out, inconvenient input is not allowed to have any emotional weight or to linger in the mind. Quite a lot, I think, is staked on that not happening.
Over the years, I’ve had many exchanges of that kind. More than I can count. At first, it took me a while to figure out what was happening. I’d had lengthy, quite detailed discussions that I’d assumed had concluded with some reluctant acknowledgement of new information – only to hear, weeks later, the same person making exactly the same noises as before, as if no demurral were valid or conceivable – and as if no conversation, or concession, had ever taken place.
It’s a little weird.
But once you fathom what the primary motivation is, and how little effect any argument or information you might muster will have, or be allowed to have… it saves quite a bit of time and aggravation.
So there’s that.
@PiperPaul
For quoted paragraphs, I’d suggest using blockquote (highlighted below in blue). Paragraphs of solid italics are harder to read.
[ Takes off quibbling spectacles. ]
[ Carefully positions quibbling spectacles on nearby satin cushion, just in case. ]
[Starts shrieking, doing tantrum dance]
But I don’t waaaana do that!
Hey, I don’t make the rules.
[ Resumes zealous making of rules. ]
At the risk of excessive repetition, leftists are deadly enemies of civilization. Treat them accordingly.
Well, Laurie Penny’s prattling, the recording of which now seems to have disappeared, was quite extraordinary. Ms Penny’s stern, rather pretentious disapproval was saved, not for the creatures who were mugging children and beating up pensioners, but for the horrified onlookers watching the news. The ones who found such behaviour appalling and who used the term feral.
They, supposedly, were the real issue. The real villains.
I should add that at the time similar sentiments were aired by other leftists. Including the literary Marxist Mr China Miéville, who claimed to be “horrified” that members of the public had used the word feral when describing the career predators and assorted thugs who, seeking excitement and a sense of power, had burned random women out of their homes. And who, on the arrival of firefighters, had dragged them from their vehicles and punched them insensible.
See also the closing paragraphs of this.
Again… same, sick dance.
Only extraordinary when compared to normal human beings. Entirely normal when compared to other leftists, who do not qualify as normal or as human beings.
And the literary Marxist Cory Doctorow who supported the London rioters.
David may then have to hire more henchlesbians. [ Shrug. ]
And then raise the prices of the drinks. [ Faints in horror. ]
[ Compiles Ephemera a day early, applauds own cunning. ]
And in cross-cultural sensitivity news.
It’s the little things that really brighten a morning.
Insanity is a culture now?
“It honestly made me feel kind of womanly.”
WTF do these men think women ARE?
Just want to remind everyone that college profs and college students were in the vanguard of the Nazi movement, along with german intellectuals.
The weird obsession with not hurting feelings now extends to hiding mug shots, not allowing people to post doorbell cams of people stealing their stuff, and using euphemisms for criminals. Oh, and obviously hiding manifestos of mass murderers if they are trans.
Because the good guys, so called, think too highly of themselves to associate with the lesser intelligent. Which is ultimately…dumb.
When you consider the AWFLs and other women who tolerate them he’s not wrong, metaphorically.
From that thread:
The parallel falls apart when we notice that, unlike the un-housebroken puppy, the rioters never get shot.
from the link:
That “yes, but what does it mean?” reminds me of effete literary critics searching out the real meaning of works of literature. No effort is spared to discover–or often more accurately to invent–obscure meanings for things with no real significance or whose meanings are so obvious as to not require the “helpful” explication of intellectuals. (And nothing is more worthy of contempt as works of literature which anyone can understand.)
[ Compiles Ephemera a day early, applauds own cunning. ]
[ Senses a great breaking of links in the Force ]
Regarding Ms Moriarty and her practised evasions, this comes to mind:
The circle of life.
[ Lion King Soundtrack rises slowly in the backgroung ]