Because You Deserve No Less
An open thread, that is – our second in 11 years. Feel free to share links of possible interest and then bicker about them.
Our first attempt, a moment of great daring and historic import, included testicle-based snacks, toilet paper shanks, the political flatulence of Patrick Stewart, and whether or not you should clean under the sofa.
If all else fails, you can always poke through the reheated series and greatest hits.
https://twitter.com/hashtag/mprraccoon?f=tweets&vertical=default&src=hash
I heard nothing about the raccoon until I got home this evening, which is remarkable given that I had lunch a block away from the event.
So much for our plan to Keep Saint Paul Boring…
Ok…hopefully this will work in the future 😉 but go here and type in the “parts search” area “121G”
Makes my little geeky heart happy …
Darleen,
This item is not available for purchase.
GAWDDAMMIT!!!
…isn’t the degree to which books, novels and such, have become fetishized more than a bit worrisome? Especially the volume of such that has been churned out in the last century or so. Especially as literacy has accelerated?
Once upon a time, all books were carefully written out, prolly with relevant costs.
And then along came Gutenberg and all heaven broke loose.
A couple of years later . . . or so . . . the internet, and particularly desktop publishing and the World Wide Web, are Gutenberg all over again.
I speak not just of the content of the books themselves (many turned into movies), each of which taken individually not such a concern, but the exceptional praise heaped upon so many of them and their writers being significantly out of proportion to the value added.
As regularly gets noticed, For you will always have the hipster among you.
Soooo . . . given that one and all survived the “horrors” of Gutenberg, et al, being able to continue on entirely as well does seem likely.
Curses. Now I’m invested in the fate of the raccoon.
The raccoon is on the roof. I repeat, THE RACCOON IS ON THE ROOF.
In less happy news, Douglas Murray on cultural decline and demographic substitution.
Related, these.
Not entirely unrelated to the above.
“It’s funny how hopeless an endeavor is that your antagonists don’t want you to accomplish. As far as they want you to know, the first step in any task is to give up on it.”
And this.
https://twitter.com/TheSafestSpace/status/1006601173565149185
Sadiq Khan is a f*cking idiot.
Sadiq Khan is a f*cking idiot.
He does seem to be a preening, clownish figure – hopelessly impractical and shockingly unfocused on anything but the signalling of his own personal pieties. Such as they are.
Also, if anyone has trouble with comments not appearing, email me and I’ll prise open the spam filter.
Just to keep the etymological diversion going a little further, panoply come from the same root – pan hopla.
“It’s funny how hopeless an endeavor is that your antagonists don’t want you to accomplish. As far as they want you to know, the first step in any task is to give up on it.”
Thanks for that post RJ. It still blows me away at how apoplectic people get about the “impossibility” of this effort. It’s akin to the wide spread perception of the technological/logistical “impossibility” of building a border wall. Until you point out to them that the Chinesers built one 5 times as long hundreds/thousands of years ago.
panoply come from the same root – pan hopla.
And here for all this time I thought panoply and monopoly had similar roots. Teh moar you know****
Sadiq Khan is a f*cking idiot
Men should stop volunteering to do things.
Did I read the piece about the Swedish survivor (Expedition Robinson or some such) on this site? Because it is basically this exact situation with civilization instead of Wikipedia.
I really wish I could remember where I found it…
In less happy news, Douglas Murray on cultural decline and demographic substitution.
Related, these.
Weeeeeelllllll . . . . . .
Men should stop volunteering to do things.
As a reluctant/never-asked-for-it president of my HOA who is constantly hearing complaints from women in the neighborhood, I think this is a capital idea. TBF, the board is a bout half men/women. The complainers however run about 4:1.
Sadiq Khan is a f*cking idiot
Following Mr Khan’s latest fit of piety regarding Wikipedia, this item here came to mind. From the subsequent thread:
But apparently we must pretend that male and female psychology is somehow indistinguishable, all evidence to the contrary, and that things done voluntarily, for amusement, are somehow egregious and coercive, and therefore to be corrected, by people whose grip on reality is at best intermittent.
Incidentally, the high-rise raccoon mentioned upthread has been caught, and fed and watered, and will be released somewhere more suitable by the local wildlife management services.
Hello WTP! I’ve read a lot about HOA nuttiness, and would like to hear your side of it.
I’d rather Khan’t is blethering about Wikipedia than trying to ban knives, or adverts he thinks are horrid.
When he got in we got exactly the same rubbish from silly young lefties as we always get – the same as we got with Trudeau and Blair. Here’s a reasonably photogenic youngish male leader. He cares about our welfare and will usher in a golden age.
It would be nice to think that people learn from these experiences, and new cynics are created every time the new hope crashes and burns. Even if that’s true young idiots will always be taken in by anyone who seems ‘nice’.
Hello WTP! I’ve read a lot about HOA nuttiness, and would like to hear your side of it.
It ain’t pretty. Everyone wants their home values protected but nobody wants to live by the rules that are (supposedly) there supporting those values. Some rules written 30 years ago that would take an act of God or a unanimous vote of 250 home owners (BIRM) to change. One faction thinks one set of rules is of high importance but this, that, or the other rule is silly. Another faction thinks those silly ones are what keep the values up, but think the first faction’s favorites restrict improving the community. Of course the sum total of either faction would constitute at most 10% of the community but 75% of the complaints. Our community is of patio/garden sized, though well maintained, homes so we have either small, young families or empty nester/retirees with very few in between. Thus the energetic ones are too busy with their budding families to be concerned or take on extra responsibility and the older ones have no work to occupy themselves with and thus every little thing that goes wrong has their laser focus. And yet ask them to serve and they suddenly shut up. Which is my master plan for dealing with them on those rare occasions where they present themselves in person. And then there are the legal issues. I never cared for the legal profession but the last year of dealing with one quarrelsome, cantankerous, yet well resourced paralegal who has dragged out a baseless (IMNSHO) lawsuit out for over 10 years now, has not only confirmed damn near every suspicion I ever had but has also instilled in me a damn near pathological hatred for the profession and the legal system in general. Though I do understand that some are kind to their dogs. Think Dickens’ Bleak House but involving an amount of about $100K.
But apparently we must pretend that male and female psychology is somehow indistinguishable, all evidence to the contrary, and that things done voluntarily, for amusement, are somehow egregious and coercive, and therefore to be corrected, by people whose grip on reality is at best intermittent.
Assuming the Wikipedia contretemps is, in fact, a problem, what is the proposed solution? Dragooning women into writing things or about things which they would otherwise ignore? What part of “voluntary” does Khan not understand?
@WTP,
As a member of the profession you loathe, let me suggest that the problem is not the lawyers. Rather, the problem lies with the individuals who are paying the bills. Over my 30 plus years of practice, I concluded that second only to domestic relations, land cases–which we lump together under the term, “fence fights”–are the most emotional in the civil arena. I’ve seen people willing to spend tens of thousands of dollars fighting about something which will have a net effect on their property of less than a tenth of what they’re spending, without even considering the investment of emotion, time and bad feelings.
Because, “it’s the principle!!!!” Or, simply because they secretly enjoy being a jerk to everyone else and a set of subdivision gives them some sort of “moral” cover.
The other problem is that real estate developers generally refuse to consult with attorneys when they’re putting their homeowners/subdivision regulations into place. The worst cases are those where the developer pulled something out of a form book or cut and pasted other things together without knowing what s/he was doing, only to leave multiple time bombs ticking for the ultimate purchasers.
Finally, buyers seldom if ever actually read the restrictions and regulations pertaining to their home before they close on the sale. Then they’re confounded when something bites them in the ass ten years later.
(BTW, no rancor or ill-will involved in this reply. I understand my profession gets a bad rap, and some of it is no doubt deserved. However, much/most of it isn’t. As with any discrete demographic, there are those who are shits. They give the rest of us a bad name.)
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/high-climbing-raccoon-finally-reaches-top-of-st-paul-skyscraper-and-america-exhales/ar-AAyzFB8?li=BBnbcA1&ocid=U452DHP
Yes. Well let me say “present company excepted”. Probably. The thing is that the “solution” to most lawyer problems that lawyers point to involves, surprise, more work for lawyers. But let me point to one thing that has pretty much sucked away about the last ounce of charity I might feel. And granted, this in and of itself is not a big, big deal but I shudder when I think of how the same mistake(s) in a far more dangerous context lead to the kinds of horrors we often read about. Our miserable litigant/plaintiff, being a miserable human being in general, finally p*ssed off what we had hoped was her last lawyer. She then appealed for an extension to find a new lawyer. The judge gave her a 30 day extension. Which of course did not start at the end of her previous time period but started whenever judge boy got around to granting it. So she gets and extra week or so on top of the 30 days. Or so I was led to believe by our (insurance company provided) lawyer. So 30 days go by and I emails our boy to say, “Hey, we done now, right?”, only to hear that “Oh, upon further review of what the judge wrote, he messed up and instead of putting the date of June 8 he put June 28”. OK, so she gets three more weeks now. Meanwhile for like 5 years now we have been holding back on spending a big chunk of money to repave one of our streets just in case this lawsuit thing hits us for some dough. Thus I have to listen to certain home owners b*ching about why all this isn’t done. And yet on top of allll that, we’re not supposed to discuss exactly what is going on with this lawsuit outside of our board, lest our nasty litigant be ostracized or something. Hell, I didn’t even know about it until I was on the board for a couple years.
Oh yeah, and if this thing went (or eventually goes) to trial I and/or other members of our board gotta be held hostage in a court room for 3 days, which specific three days is only defined within the context of a month time period. The scheduling and abandoning of such put me in an awkward situation at work and (unnecessarily it turned out) forced me to reschedule a vacation. All over crap that went on 10 years ago, which is 5 years before myself or anyone on the current board ever lived in our community.
On top of all this, wife and I were having our wills done, of course by lawyers, and in the contract to do the work the lawyers recommend that we have that contract reviewed by…a lawyer. Kaching-kaching-kaching.
Though to be fair, as you say lawyers shouldn’t bear all of the blame here. It’s the huge number of laws that are a huge part of the problem. But then, where do those laws come from?
I’m an old timer in an all-volunteer organization filled with a variety of experienced professionals. I manage my workload, and incoming suggestions about doing things better, the same way: “Great idea! When are you able to get started on that?”
Works a treat, and sometimes stuff actually gets done.
Re: HOA (sorta), in about 1980 my father became president of his local neighborhood association (no actual powers, just advisory). For some reason he wanted to review the historical county budgets. When he called the county about this, the nice lady said “I think those are classified.”
!!??
Bureaucrats. Avoiding work since Hammurabi.
[ Searches Amazon for “old curmudgeon rocking chairs.” ]
Re: HOA (sorta), in about 1980 my father became president of his local neighborhood association (no actual powers, just advisory). For some reason he wanted to review the historical county budgets. When he called the county about this, the nice lady said “I think those are classified.”
Well, not anymore. Certainly not in Florida. I’ve been doing some volunteer research for a government watchdog group and gathered the names and contracts for all lobbyists in our county by entities funded by taxpayers. Cities, county, school board, etc. Got pretty good cooperation. We have a “government in the sunshine” law here that came to be in the late 70’s I believe. I think that has spread to most other states by now.
[ Searches Amazon for “old curmudgeon rocking chairs.” ]
Dude. I saw that. Now how’s it gonna be a surprise? Though Christmas is still 6 months away…
The thing is that the “solution” to most lawyer problems that lawyers point to involves, surprise, more work for lawyers.
Not really. The problem is, people view up-front, prevention costs as prohibitive without considering the risk they’re taking for huge bills to solve a problem in the future that shouldn’t exist. Further, especially in the real estate context, real estate agents/brokers/developers view up-front lawyer involvement as something to be avoided, because all we do is “mess up the deal.” The thing is, real estate professionals only get paid if the deal goes through, so they have an incentive to minimize or gloss over potential problems. I, however, get paid no matter what, and thus, my concern is always my clients’ best interests.
As to your subdivision tormentor, it appear that s/he is the problem, not lawyers. Evidently, lawyers don’t stick around long. And yes, I’ve dealt with the dreaded pro se litigant before. They are a pain. The Constitution, however, guarantees access to the courts, so dealing with idiots is a necessary evil. As are laws, for that matter. Laws don’t come from lawyers; they start as a complaint by some citizen or group about something to a legislator who needs something to do to campaign on in the next election.
I need to get a younger, more happening crowd in here. Switched-on types with skateboards and boomboxes and… er, those things that… you know, fidget spinners
What part of “voluntary” does Khan not understand?
From his background and apparent politics, my guess would be all of it, except as in Cubans or Cambodians voluntarily working in the fields.
Well my boy Sherman, as I said, I’ve gone pathological. So legally speaking I’m not really responsible for anything I have to say on the subject ;). However not very citizen with a complaint MUST be taken seriously. Lawyers refuse to take cases all the time. The interesting thing is, on what grounds do we suppose most cases are passed? To me the problem lies with the huge volume of that profession that were turned out in the post-war period. Mothers bragged if their sons were a doctor or a lawyer. As if equal value. Maybe in the pre-war period or so. But now we’re thick with them and they owe a lotta dough. I shoot pool with a few. I have a friend whose daughter graduated from Cornell Law School, clerked with a district judge. Still took her considerable time to get into a decent paying job because even at the high end, the market is flooded. And those student loans are harder for lawyers to skirt FWIU. Though I was a little surprised to hear that.
Switched-on types with skateboards and boomboxes and… er, those things that… you know, fidget spinners
I still got a set of Clackers in a box in the attic somewhere if that helps you any. Hold on, BRB….
WTP: The budget records my father sought were not classified. County budgets had been public documents for decades by that time.
No, this was simply an instance of a county employee trying to avoid work. Even de minimus work, since SOP at that office was for folks to come in, do their own lookups, have a clerk pull microfilms, and then make their own photocopies.
Another example- in his official job as Director and Chief Test Pilot at NASA Ames Research Center, and an expert on aviation accidents, he requested certain records from the FAA. What eventually, after several delays, showed up at his office was a large mailer envelope with several hundred pieces of paper. Randomly ordered. Apparently a clerk had dropped the stack, and merely stuffed the resulting mess in a bulk mailer.
That is the kind of work product one gets from unfireable employees.
I still got a set of Clackers in a box in the attic somewhere
They come with Bluetooth, right?
Fred,
Yes, that was kind of what I expected. I was pleasantly surprised at the degree of cooperation I received. Except from the school board. They have some sort of exemption such that they can charge for the request, which could not be emailed and thus arrived via snail-mail on a DVD. They also seemed rather terse when I questioned having to pay them $17 for public information.
They come with Bluetooth, right?
Yeah. Sure. OK, I kid. Of course we all know that the standard back then was based on the Petticoat 5.
“I still got a set of Clackers in a box in the attic somewhere”
They come with Bluetooth, right?
– only if you smack yourself in the teeth with them, just right…
@WTP
I don’t disagree regarding the surfeit of attorneys. I’ve seen enough of the newbies to last multiple lifetimes. That problem is the result of a) profligate student loan policies (which provided zero incentive for law schools to keep costs down) and the explosion of junk “studies” degrees which ill-prepared graduates for doing anything else in the work force, leading to an “I’ll just go to law school” mindset.
And yes good lawyers refuse crap cases all the time, primarily because they’ve got better, more lucrative things to do with their time.
leading to an “I’ll just go to law school” mindset.
Not to be too harsh, as if I haven’t been harsh enough already, but one thing I found amusing when attending my 20 year high school reunion was that how many of the reefer tokers had gone on to become lawyers. I presumed because so much of their youth was spent as kind of a reverse internship. Agree on the profligate student loan policies as well.
I need to get a younger, more happening crowd in here
I’m only 32, so I’m probably still able to make videogame references. If that would help.
[ Places large jar of moisturiser on bar. ]
Since we’re talking about lawyers, maybe we can all cheer this one:
http://nationalpost.com/news/canada/lindsay-shepherd-files-lawsuit-against-wilfrid-laurier-university-claiming-attacks-have-rendered-her-unemployable-in-academia
WTP,
Part of the problem is that too many state/public law schools abandoned the idea that the practice of law is a trade, and not a chin-stroking, intellectual exercise. When I attended, the focus of the course work was on practical stuff: land law, criminal defense, estate planning, real life contracts, trial practice, etc. Sure there were a few “My Eyes Glaze Over” seminars, but most of it was nuts and bolts, day to day, “how do I do this” stuff. Most of my classmates left school and went into the country to small county seats and hung up shingles or went to work with small firms where it was sink or swim. None of us had any illusions about becoming law professors or federal judges.
Sometime in the late ’80s the U.S. News rankings started wagging the dog and more schools thought they needed to be some philosophical salon instead of a trade school. I saw it slowly happen with my alma mater, as students I was interviewing had fewer of the courses I needed to help me in what I was doing. I recall asking a very serious applicant how a survey course in Domestic Relations Law in the E.U. (I shit you not) was going to help me defend a farmer whose cattle had broken through a fence and wound up on an interstate highway at midnight?
As a consequence, you have very “educated” young attorneys who can’t do anything and wind up clogging up the system with crap.
YMMV
Sadiq Khan is what happens when, in order to seem virtuous, progressive, non-judgemental, anti-racist, etc., you decide to elect politicians based on their membership of certain minority or identity groups rather than their competence. See also: Abbott, Diane.
I need to get a younger, more happening crowd in here.
I’m in my mid-twenties. Do I count?
Between Nemo and Sporkatus I’m now starting to feel old, dammit.
I’m in my mid-twenties. Do I count?
You’d better mingle, youth the place up a bit. I’ll dim the lighting around the elderly.
I’ll dim the lighting around the elderly.
Of course, it will be we elderly who are here at closing time left with all the youthful, yet somehow unpaid, bar tabs.