Friday Ephemera
Farewell, old friend. (h/t, Damian) || High-speed fabulousness is now a thing. || Lifestyle choice. Choose wisely, children. || A compendium of skillz. (h/t, Obnoxio) || The interactive Bluetooth mood-light salt dispenser you’ve all been waiting for. || Today’s word is tonguebath. || Best done outdoors. || He does this better than you do. || Today’s other word is busted. (h/t, Tim) || Bond title sequences. || At last, a sweat towel for your ta-tas. || Illusion of note. || Kayaking through a cargo ship. || Ye internet of yore. || Voyage ongoing. || Grievance is easy. || The swinging Sixties. || Wardrobe solutions. || Something error happen. || Tiny desktop dramas. || Masculine Women and Feminine Men, 1932. || And finally, the absurd tragedy of the Great London Beer Flood of 1814.
Wondering if there is an 18% man tax?
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/08/10/total-losers-unable-to-cope-with-trumps-win-have-professional-cuddling-business-n2366576
There’s a book about a disastrous molasses flood in Boston, ca 1910.
I like the office dioramas!
Here’s a guy willing to defend Countess Bathory.
http://justnotsaid.blogspot.com/?m=0
A related disaster in the making.
Re Illusion…The science says the lines are parrallel but Teh Truth tells us, definitively, that they are not. See how that works?
I’m going to need a bigger bag of popcorn.
Today’s word is tonguebath.
I believe that’s been used to describe the Media’s behavior towards the Teleprompter Jesus his entire presidency.
Here’s a guy willing to defend Countess Bathory.
Well, he lost me with “The fact is, female serial killers are extremely rare, and those who kill for sexual reasons are almost nonexistent.” and “The reason FBI profilers are usually successful is precisely because these killers have a profile.”, all “facts” which have since been shown to be disastrously wrong.
“Beer historian” New dream job found!
Today’s other word is busted.
It’s a miracle! Hallelujah!
Cover version of note.
Farewell, old friend.
They’ve been hiding among us all this time.
They’ve been hiding among us all this time.

And from the subsequent Twitter thread:
Piperpaul,
No: that’s a photo of some barrels that may or may not contain maple syrup.
http://nationalpost.com/news/canada/the-great-maple-syrup-heist-trial-opens-in-largest-theft-ever-investigated-by-quebec-police/wcm/dc429343-d505-43ab-a628-f6d96b376d43
Choice quotes:
“The barrels were moved to a sugar shack belonging to Raymond Vallières, where they were emptied and replaced with water from a nearby creek.”
“Finally, the thieves drained the barrels directly at the federation warehouse.”
Holy crap, it’s exactly like Fort Knox, but with maple syrup!
Blue lives matter.
https://youtu.be/UJDP043aQfs?t=1m41s
Related to The Thread That Will Nor Die, It’s Time to Give Up on Facts Or at least to temporarily lay them down in favor of a more useful weapon: emotions.
I thought giving up on reality was something the left had done ages ago.
I thought giving up on reality was something the left had done ages ago.
Well, abandoning the conventions of formal debate is more egalitarian. Not everyone can put together a convincing argument, or indeed understand one; but everyone has feelz.
The (very tiny) robots are coming.
The coming part happened before the tiny robots, no?
WTP,
The science says the lines are parallel…
Fascinating – tell us more about this infinite laboratory you have.
Meanwhile, in the world of diversity, Georgetown Law School comes up with some fine Newspeak, as they get rid of the LSAT as an admission criterion.
Right, we want the best and brightest who aren’t bright enough not to bolo the LSAT, as long as they are sufficiently pigmented.
Now there is a Grade A blinding flash of the obvious.
Blue lives matter.
If you watch the reality series Cops, you’ll have seen that behaviour many, many times. Indulging it can have severe, or fatal, consequences.
Nemo,
Good point. Correction…the science says the line segments are parrallel. Better? Or best, since a true line is an abstract concept that conceptually exists outside the rules of a universe, which by most definitions would need to contain objects that have mass and thus … forget it. We’re screwed. The universe is philosophically flawed. Where’d that bong wander off to…
The laboratory needs to exist within Borges’ Library of Babel. If not infinite, approaching it sufficiently.
The NY Times, excavating a near-mantle section of the crust below the bottom of the barrel:
Meanwhile, the AP questions if US ballistic missile defenses *should* shoot down anything aimed at Guam. Moral quandary, that.
Scientists in Guam, however, say they have at least one other major threat in mind:…
Let us never forget this classic threat described by a member of The World’s Greatest Deliberative Body™.
Farnsworth,
Maybe the Guamanians can tip it over for protection, and flip it back again when the threat is passed.
Spiny,
Good point, I understand they already do that to cool it down of if they get too much climate change.
Tipping, drowning, getting too hot, nuclear risks…
Why, it’s almost enough to make one not want to build a retirement mansion there. That and the remoteness.
Sporkatus,
Meanwhile, the AP questions if US ballistic missile defenses *should* shoot down anything aimed at Guam. Moral quandary, that.
I’ve been pondering the same question, but from a strategic point of view – balancing the intelligence value of revealing defensive capabilities against the likelihood of the Norks actually being able to hit anything of value. A little uncertainty in your enemies’ minds can go a long way, though I doubt Trump’s domestic antagonists would understand such nuanced restraint, even where they capable of doing so.
Competitive Victimhood
Competitive Victimhood
There are evidently large numbers of people who’ve been taught to view victimhood, even of the most laughably pretentious kind, as an almost transcendental state, certainly an aspiration, on grounds that it bestows instant piety, at least among idiots, and all manner of leverage.
Left unchecked, it’s a trend that could ruin a civilisation.
WTP,
Certainly amusing, but better? Rather than risk appearing merely contrarian, I’ll give a little more of my reasoning behind my initial comment, and let you decide: science is too often mischaracterised and invoked by those who wish to capitalise on its cachet, even where that cachet is undeserved in the first place; it is a wonderful method to support or – more reliably – refute the things we believe about the world around us; it is both a tool of and utterly dependent upon reason, but no more, yet it is constantly misused by people seeking to signal their rational credentials – the evolutionary hypothesis seeming to particularly cause such invocation, with environmentalism catching up fast. Yet, far from adhering to science as many such people claim, they’re actually undermining it by making exaggerated claims of its power, and erroneous claims about science are particularly galling when supposedly counteracting the anti-science PoMo subjectivists – you’re actually succoring the suckers. Regarding parallel lines, reason and custom are sufficient: no experiment is needed and we’re willing to accept the measurement limitations without running off to infinity.
As to the bong, wasn’t that repurposed for the pickled eggs, storage thereof?
Or at the least, make it quite stagnant.
It’s rather funny how (as some have termed it) the “We was kings” narrative is also “we was victims”. Rather a shoddy sort of empire if just *anyone* can walk in and mess it about a bit.
Me, I reserve recognition of my ancestry to “we was assholes”. Saves time, useful shorthand, etc.
(Assume Steve 2’s ancestral shitlordery tale here)
Nemo, agree.
Regarding parallel lines, reason and custom are sufficient: no experiment is needed
Agree, though the door to absurdity is always there. There’s a line somewhere. It’s sophomore dorm room stuff but back in such of my times there was an ongoing argument, which started with the commonly taught idea that the Arabs invented the zero (which of course they “stole” from the Hindus, who I’m sure “stole” it from … but I digress), as to what was zero? Since there was (as was taught) no such thing as a perfect vacuum, could zero have any meaning? To which I asked, using that reference point, then wtf is one? If there’s not an indivisible unit of something then there is no one. And even if there is, no one can produce such by itself. Which is why I stay away from certain drugs to this day. I was beginning to recover when I encountered The Banach–Tarski paradox, and thus my faith in math (does math include set theory?…another argument) was undermined again.
Hmm…pickling eggs in bong water…hmmm…not for me but maybe fun to watch…
I thought giving up on reality was something the left had done ages ago.
In Australia, the government have offered a plebiscite on gay marriage. What are the left campaigning for? “Stop the vote”. Because the people who oppose it will be allowed to campaign.
I give up.
Hmm…pickling eggs in bong water…hmmm…not for me but maybe fun to watch…
If I wave this torch near it, it’s like a lava lamp.
Rather a shoddy sort of empire if just *anyone* can walk in and mess it about a bit.
That bit never seems to dawn on them.
One Mr. Michael Harrison in the link above seems to think that there were black people some 650 million years ago who populated the entire planet when there was one putative supercontinent, but through anthropogenic continental drift eventually populated Europe and North America (and Antarctica !), but though possessing advanced civilizations, were enslaved by Cavepersons of Pallor, evidently totally exterminated by Indians crossing the “Barrien” Strait until brought back by the aforementioned cavepersons, and I guess eaten by penguins in Antarctica.
anthropogenic continental drift
“This is how the continents were positioned before the Industrial Revolution in the mid 18th century.”
Heh.
… but though possessing advanced civilizations, were enslaved by Cavepersons of Pallor,
WE
David, yesterday we had Sgt Allen of the Sussex Constabulary investigating kids calling each other names, and now this – police dogs, ur doin’ it wrong.

Have all the police high priced help gone round the bend ?
I wonder, were those coppers to have a number of buxom women on chain in a John Normany sort of way, would it be as well received…
WTP,
Well, I’d never heard of the Banach-Tarski paradox, so duckduckgo’d it and my mind instinctively recoiled at what seemed mathematical legerdemain, so I didn’t know whether to thank you ironically or sincerely – though I simultaneously looked at the half-finished bottle of Cab Sauv on the fireplace and thought I’d need to open another. I opened the Fitou, but it only took a glass of the Cab to decide that my first instinct was correct – it seems little more than a hierarchical category issue. Using Russell’s paradox as an example, if I have six apples and put them in a bag I then have twelve apples – six apples plus a bag of six apples. I’m massively oversimplifying for effect, but it does seem to be giving the descriptor the same properties as the thing it describes, which may be useful and even valid in certain circumstances, but a paradox built on whimsy.
As to the roiling eggs, I believe if the money’s right then Rutger Hauer – or his replica – will come down to earth and pick them out for you. Batty as that might sound…
As to the bong, wasn’t that repurposed for the pickled eggs, storage thereof?
*cough*
What?
It seems we can add cartoons to the things the folk at Everyday Feminism don’t understand how to do.
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/896069639389630465
TomJ,
If you wander over to EF, I believe you will find that crappy cartoons have been a staple for a long time.
They are pretty much the “feminist” equivalent of Jack Chick.
I have thus far only experienced the output of EF through the filter of our genial host. There’s no point his risking his sanity by reading that drivel so we don’t have to if we go and expose ourselves as well.
“I give up.”
Prog mission accomplished.