Academia, That Temple Of The Mind
Further to this, Heather Mac Donald recounts her recent harassment by 300 or so student Mao-lings:
When speakers need police escort on and off college campuses, an alarm bell should be going off that something has gone seriously awry… I am reluctant to wield the epithet “fascist” as promiscuously as my declared opponents do. But it must be observed that if campus conservatives tried to use physical force to block Senator Elizabeth Warren, say, from giving a speech, the New York Times would likely put the obstruction on the front page and the phrase “fascist” would be flying around like a swarm of hornets, followed immediately by the epithet “misogynist.”
Indeed. But it seems highly unlikely that the mob of dogmatic morons – the ones banging on windows, blocking fire escapes and assaulting faculty – would wish their behaviour to be constrained by something as inconvenient as consistent and reciprocal principles. Despite the chanted professions of piety, what matters to the ‘protestors’, whose grasp of Ms Mac Donald’s written output is somewhat sketchy, is the thrill of harassing people, frustrating them, scaring them. And thereby, a sense of power.
Also this:
Of all the chants, “How do you spell racist?” “C-M-C,” was the most absurd. “Racist” Claremont McKenna College is so desperate for “diverse” students that it has historically admitted black and Hispanic students with an average 200-point lower SAT score than white and Asian students. Such racial preferences satisfy CMC’s desire for racial virtue but set the alleged beneficiaries up for academic struggles, if not failure.
As noted here. Such institutional privilege also provides an unending supply of academic inadequates who, feeling incongruous, direct their resentments into thuggish ‘activism’, which gratifies all manner of unbecoming impulses, and requires less intelligence.
I think there’s a bit of grit in the works
[ Pokes about under bar, tugging at wires. ]
Ah.
Quite.
[ Pokes about under bar, tugging at wires. ]
Thanks David.
Ooh, nearly forgot.

[ Compiles furiously. ]
The contemporary literature professor need not even be an expert on any particular author or literary figure, but can be expected to be a master at applying a particular interpretive lens such as Queer Theory or Critical Race Theory.
Behold your new moral overlords.
‘Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?’
What a stupid time to be alive.
Hmmm. That reminds me of this.
That. >_<
Janice Fiamengo explains why it’s probably unwise to take health advice from feminists.
“Well, anyone could have seen that coming after they decided that banning guns would stop shootings.”
Check out Chicago. City has the tightest gun control laws, and yet has the highest rate of gun murders per capita in the US.
That’s unpossible. I’ve been assured that common-sense gun controls will eliminate such crimes.
“Free speech = hate speech”
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1129250700520674&set=a.769616689817412.1073741828.100003072643308&type=3&theater
OOT, another regressive speaks her truth…
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.za/shelley-garland/could-it-be-time-to-deny-white-men-the-franchise_a_22036640/
from champ’s link:
Because it has worked so well in Zimbabwe.
Are there classes of wealth that are less violent and/or less privileged? Surely a three-dollar-bill, being queer…
Jokes aside, it takes a very special kind of malignity to ascribe violence to possessions. To say nothing of the fixed-pie lie on display.
A large part of the successes of “white privilege” may well be rooted in the sanctity of property right in the first place – impossible for a cluster, family, or individual to advance and build anything for the future if every generation loses everything anew… arguably, this describes much of Africa even without Whitey anywhere in the offing.
Best to return to that for the sake of authenticity. All this fixed wealth that’s lying around will make it better this time, we swear.
The violence of white male wealth and income inequality will be a thing of the past.
And this practised idiocy is found chiefly, and most unshiftably, among the supposedly educated. Parents and alumni please take note.
I just came here to link to the Huffington Post article champ added. What’s that phrase for when it’s tough to say if an article is satire or not?
The author suggests that all white males are responsible for the actions of every other white male, past or present. As a white male I offer my apologies for the Holocaust, but you’re also welcome for the end of the Holocaust. I apologize for slavery in the United States, but you’re welcome for the end of slavery in the United States. You’re also welcome for airplanes, vaccines, Calculus, the printing press, pasteurization, transistors, and toilet paper. Probably forgot a few things.
@False Profiteer: You’re missing the “arc of history” article of faith. Leftism believes that history has a natural outworking, a purpose, a final end. Therefore we have only history and evolution to thank for the (inevitable) advances – which just as surely would have come from POCs left unoppressed.
This neat bit of sophistry means that advances are simultaneously everyone’s and no-ones, with the sins of Whitey as his alone (and everyone else with him to blame!) It’s the success with many fathers, failure an orphan idiom actually codified into a belief system.
From the Huffpost article: …and it is not just South Africa where white males own a disproportionate amount of wealth.
I wonder if any other ethnic groups with a disproportionate share of wealth or power she’ll demand are disenfranchised, or just white men?
“Social justice” on campus, Muhammadan-style.
“Social justice” on campus, Muhammadan-style.

Sighs.
It’s their culture man.
Are you a Nazi or something?
Protesters are on the way to your comment right now:
What’s that phrase for when it’s tough to say if an article is satire or not?
“It’s on the internet.”
</curtsey>
it takes a very special kind of malignity to ascribe violence to possessions
“Violence” is fast joining just luminous terms as “racism” and “fascism” in the pantheon of meaningless insults. The people screaming about it are unlikely to have even been on the receiving end of *actual* violence. A deficiency which is probably going to be corrected within the not-too-distant future.
Apparently, Lauren Southern is a “Nazi” and someone to “punch.”
Apparently, Lauren Southern is a “Nazi” and someone to “punch.”
Step 1: Argue that it’s Ok to use violence against Fascists, because Hitler!
Step 2: Define anyone you don’t like as a Fascist.
Result: Utopia!
It looks like antifa got their clocks cleaned by Trump supporters in Berkeley:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8GVtXfATtI
Lauren Southern has more.
Lauren Southern has more.
I have a smile on my face right now.
This is hilarious – just look at all these ‘white supremacists’ celebrating their victory over the heroic warriors of Antifa!
https://twitter.com/irmahinojosa_/status/853441335054958593
And speaking of barely literate “diversity” hires, as mentioned upthread, here’s another example, with some insight into the apparently quite tribal hiring process. As elementary grammar and punctuation are evidently deemed superfluous, along with general clarity, even among faculty, and even in official documents, I suspect the “Liberal Studies” department at NYU is probably best avoided.
Tactical research suggestion.

The Mao-lings have spoken, comrades.
“[H]ostility may be warranted.”
Even funnier, Trump supporters were giving beaten Antifa crybabies wedgies:
https://twitter.com/PeckPolitics/status/853410278905700352