Elsewhere (225)
Heather Mac Donald on the farce and scope of UC Berkeley’s cultivated victimhood:
UC Berkeley’s Division of Equity and Inclusion has hung vertical banners across the main campus reminding students of the contemporary university’s paramount mission: assigning guilt and innocence within the ruthlessly competitive hierarchy of victimhood… “I will acknowledge how power and privilege intersect in our daily lives,” vows an Asian female member of the class of 2017. Just how crippling is that “intersection” of “power and privilege”? The answer comes in a banner showing a black female student in a backward baseball cap and a male Hispanic student, who together urge the Berkeley community to “Create an environment where people other than yourself can exist.” A naïve observer of the Berkeley campus would think that lots of people “other than himself” exist there, and would even think that Berkeley welcomes those “other” people with overflowing intellectual and material riches. Such a misperception, however, is precisely why Berkeley funds the Division of Equity and Inclusion with a cool $20 million annually and staffs it with 150 full-time functionaries: it takes that much money and personnel to drum into students’ heads how horribly Berkeley treats its “othered” students.
Jade Haney on blatant indoctrination and replacing facts with pretentious guilt:
Jack Flotte, a member of Regis University’s Social Justice and Spirituality Committee, opened the session by scolding his white peers and professors on their state of “white fragility,” saying, “Like it or not, we are already accomplices. The question becomes: to what end are we partners in the crime of continuing to perpetuate these systems that dehumanise and oppress people?” Flotte also advised white students and faculty to “spend less time being upset about accusations that you’re complicit and that white people are bad and spend more time being mad at the racism and suffering,” adding, “Stop changing the subject when race does come into a conversation. Not that you understand this concept of white fragility. You’re going to be made uncomfortable as white folks when the conversation of race comes up. But, just get over it and then channel that energy. Channel that guilt into activism.”
See also, Laurie Penny.
Speaking of dehumanising people, and added via the comments, here’s Black Lives Matter Toronto co-founder Yusra Khogali being every bit as charming as you’d imagine. What’s particularly endearing – after all the boasting of genetic superiority, and her claim that “melanin directly communicates with cosmic energy” – is when she asks Allah to give her the strength “to not kill these men and white folks.”
Anthony Gockowski on paranoid parents:
Evergreen State College will soon host a workshop for eager parents who wish to pre-empt their toddlers from developing [racial] “bias” before it’s too late. The February 17 event, titled “A is for Anti-Bias,” will apparently “help family members interested in anti-bias education for children ages 3-6 to hear and talk about strategies, books, and resources that can be used at home.”
And Kevin Williamson on the importance of life outside politics:
Earlier this week, I expressed what seemed to me an unobjectionable opinion: that politics has a place, that politics should be kept in its place, and that happy and healthy people and societies have lives that are separate from politics. The response was dispiriting but also illuminating. Among those who directed tut-tuts in my direction was Patti Bacchus, who writes about education for the Vancouver Observer. “That’s one of the most privileged things I’ve ever heard,” she sniffed. Patti Bacchus is the daughter of Charles Balfour, a Vancouver real-estate entrepreneur, and attended school at Crofton House, a private girls’ school whose alumni include Pat (Mrs. William F.) Buckley. It is one of the most expensive private schools in Canada. I do enjoy disquisitions on “privilege” from such people.
Feel free to add your own links and snippets, on any subject, in the comments.
That chick has sadist written all over her.
It makes me wonder what her teaching of middle-school children is like.
If it gets that bad, though, we’re looking at Civil War II and all bets are off. I’m becoming increasingly afraid of this eventuality.
When one looks at incidents like those at Berkeley, it’s easy to become disheartened. Still, there are those maps of county election results for 2016 which tell a different story. The Left certainly fantasizes about a grand insurrection to overthrow the established order, but in truth, the Left’s influence is disproportionate to its actual representation among the populace. There might be substantial civil disruption, but it’s likely to occur in places where the Bolsheviks are beating the shit out of the Mensheviks.
Note that they only take “direct action” in places where they know no one will fight back.
Yep. And in those cities, they only target businesses where they know there won’t be a owner standing guard with a shotgun.
Hence, Starbucks takes a brick through the window every time. It’s a soft target.
Which might be true, especially in large Democrat-run cities.
Not even then, I suspect. It has been reported that the Berkeley 5-0 were ordered to stand down, which, having seen the video of Miss Felarca and her gang of goons beating up the Trump supporter with the cops just standing there, is easy to believe, but stand down order or not, I really doubt that they would if these maggots were in their neighborhoods threatening their families and property.
Still, there are those maps of county election results for 2016 which tell a different story.
Indeed, but even that is a bit misleading, if you take out anomalies like the Mississippi Delta and the Alabama Black Belt* all you are left with is mainly urban centres (note that the giant blue San Bernardino County – larger than the lower third of New England – would be red if not for San Bernardino the city, likewise the almost as huge Coconino in Arizona which is afflicted with Flagstaff).
There might be substantial civil disruption, but it’s likely to occur in places where the Bolsheviks are beating the shit out of the Mensheviks.
Exactly, all those red counties are not going to be particularly perturbed because the rioting in Palo Alto has delayed the latest Adobe releases, but if they want to block the highways so food and other essentials from the hinterlands can’t get through, it will suck to be them. I suspect strategic planning and logistics are not among Angry Studies coursework. It might be the first time in history a group laid siege to them selves, so it could be interesting.
*(This time I will not denounce myself, it is so named because of the soil, not the inhabitants.)
Apologies for those who have heard this before, but it was news to me so was very excited at how relevant it was to the discussion above.
One of the recent ‘In Our Times’ dealt with Nietzche and the genealogy of morality. And during the discussion about the master/slave relationship they talked about the concept of ‘ressentiment’. It’s fascinating, and incredibly relevant to the modern social justice warrior phenomenon, I think. Very much worth a listen. It gives an insight into why they will never be satisfied. Why it is impossible to buy them off.
Very much worth a listen.
Is a link available?
It might be the first time in history a group laid siege to them selves, so it could be interesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5ba1OKY7Xc
The Governor of Upper Canada, John Graves Simcoe, pushed through legislation which forbad the importation of slaves into Upper Canada as of 1795. Due to ‘public’ pressure, slaves brought into the colony prior to 1795 were legal, but had to be freed within 25 years.
York replaced Niagara-on-the-Lake as capital of UC, and was later renamed ‘Toronto’.
Cheers
I invented a sugar pill that cures white privilege and you only ever need to take one, it costs a mere 10 cents, and the science behind it is unassailable.
How much do you think the left will pay me to keep it off the market?
How much do you think the left will pay me to keep it off the market?
Nothing—It’s obviously fraudulent.
You need to charge “only” fifty seven cents a pill and add that sales will be refused for being too “expensive” . . .
Ah, you’re a science denier!
But a marketing genius.
Ah, you’re a science denier!
But a marketing genius.
If you’re giving it away at only ten cents a pill, then obviously there is no value to it and you’re clearly commuting fraud. So what you need is a collection of online black bloc fascists–yes, I repeat myself—loudly denouncing you for being a vicious profit monger, so that you are then forced cut your price to twenty five cents—easier for the buyers to add, that way—and then be forced to sell for merely twenty five cents a pill . . . . .
I rest my case….
https://twitter.com/RealPeerReview/status/831980751113576454
Referencing Laclau’s perception of “hauntologies” to texts (adapted from Derrida) I posit that the presence/specter of the queer villain Moriarty can be read as a caesura challenging performed hegemonic masculinity.