Reheated (46)
For newcomers, more items from the archives:
Living in Glasgow for a year is art, says taxpayer-funded artist who lives in Glasgow.
Writing in the Guardian, Liam Hainey rushes to defend Ms Harrison’s low-effort art project, denouncing “budget butchers” and asking his readers to “look at the bigger picture.” All while carefully ignoring anything that might trouble the assumptions of the freeloading arts community. Mr Hainey, a former Green councillor, dismisses the widespread mockery of Ms Harrison’s hustle as “predictable.” But he doesn’t seem to grasp that much of the mockery occurs because hustles of this type are themselves so predictable – that what we’re seeing, yet again, is a display of arrogant presumption, one that’s routine among a socially and politically narrow subsidy-seeking caste. And so Mr Hainey tells us, triumphantly, that the money isn’t in fact being wasted because it was already earmarked for art that would probably be unpopular and which nobody asked for.
Feminist “creative” Katherine Garcia attempts to justify her sub-optimal life choices. Things go badly wrong.
In financial terms, the lifetime return on an arts degree is very often negative and there’s something to be said for practicality, especially if your background is a modest one. Social mobility presupposes a certain realism, a pragmatism, and making choices accordingly – say, with regard to the costs and benefits of tertiary education, which is for most an expensive one-time opportunity. I’m inclined to suggest that getting into further debt for a grad school degree in Women and Gender Studies, as Ms Garcia did, is possibly not an ideal way to help one’s family economically, or indeed oneself.
Riyad A Shahjahan says we must “disrupt Eurocentric notions of time.” Because punctuality is racist and oppressive.
As the exact nature of Dr Shahjahan’s problem has been buried under rhetorical rubble, I’ll translate as best I can. You see, being expected to keep up with the pace of lessons and deliver course work on time can induce feelings of discomfort and inferiority in those less able and conscientious, thereby resulting in “exclusionary effects,” which, it turns out, are oppressive and unjust. However, armed with postcolonial theorising, and by stressing the mystical exoticness of people with browner skin, we shall set the people free from the “dominant culture of disembodiment” and the “temporal colonisation of our bodies” – i.e., expectations of punctuality, attentiveness and general competence. Yes, we must “contest the insertion of the body into the market.”
There’s more to poke at in the updated greatest hits. And tickling the tip jar makes my phone go ping. Which is nice.
In WTF news:
“Man Violently Shoves Feces-Filled Bag Down Woman’s Pants on Upper East Side: NYPD”
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Man-Shoves-Bag-Feces-Down-Woman-Pants-Upper-East-Side-New-York-City-Video-384950011.html
Man Violently Shoves Faeces-Filled Bag Down Woman’s Pants on Upper East Side: NYPD
I can’t help noticing that the description of the man, which is presumably intended to warn the public or solicit help in his capture, omits a certain detail.
David – is this a Comment Type 43 situation?
I can’t help noticing that the description of the man (…) omits a certain detail.
Well, yes, but the US population is by now well-trained and fills in the blanks. The lack of specificity about a given characteristic is a dead give-away to what the characteristic actually is.
is this a Comment Type 43 situation?
It would seem so, yes. I was told about this phenomenon months before I took it seriously. Now it’s hard not to see it on an almost daily basis.
The lack of specificity about a given characteristic is a dead give-away to what the characteristic actually is.
I’ve been repeatedly told that political correctness is “just about politeness.” But clearly it’s not. It’s about a practised unrealism, learning to pretend.
learning to pretend.
And then pretending that you’re not pretending.
Doublethink.
a practised unrealism, learning to pretend
Doublethink
Yes, but notwithstanding the best efforts of the authorities and of the SJWs, the approach has its limitations. Let me put it this way: if a crime gets committed in Uganda, the police, when putting out the description of the perpetrator, don’t usually find it necessary to mention that he was black. It’s Uganda, so you’d expect that. In the US, given that 95% or thereabouts of the crime is perpetrated by black males, it’s also not strictly speaking necessary to mention the race of the perpetrator, unless he isn’t black. So the omission of any mention of race only serves to underscore that the perpetrator is, what else, a black male.
Doublethink
Somewhat relevant. Ben Shapiro tries to shoehorn some realism into the mind of Sally Kohn.
Based on what I’ve seen of her, it’s very likely that Ms Kohn will refuse to process the information she’s being given, all of which is readily available, and will refuse to rethink her assumptions, sweeping as they are, and instead will go on shouting the same boilerplate next month and the month after that and the year after that – while knowing, or at least suspecting, that the facts don’t entirely support it. That’s the real doublethink.
Based on what I’ve seen of her, it’s very likely that Ms Kohn will refuse to process the information she’s being given…
She will refuse to process it, she is a raving leftist which in her “mind” means she is automatically right.
Anyone who reads these pages and hasn’t read Thomas Sowell’s The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy needs to hit David’s Amazon thing and buy it to get more insight into these intellectual four-flushers.
Signs of Ms Kohn’s brain fever have been noted here previously. Because when you’re in a jam and a stranger does you a favour, the first thing you should do is publicly insult them by implying – based on nothing – that they’re racist and wouldn’t have done the same if Ms Kohn had happened to be black.
Ms Kohn tells us she’s “one of the leading progressive voices in America” and “a thorn in the side of the status quo.”
In the meantime a Cambridge academic economist who doesn’t like the way her fellow citizens vote attends a faculty meeting naked with writing all over her breasts.
http://m.cambridge-news.co.uk/cambridge-academic-attends-university-meeting-naked-to-protest-over-brexit/story-29466081-detail/story.html
And nothing says “take me seriously” like incongruous nudity and scribbled-on boobs.
Wonder if she attended her PhD viva like that?
In the meantime a Cambridge academic economist who doesn’t like the way her fellow citizens vote attends a faculty meeting naked…
Having seen the Page 3 girls, no, you most definitely are not better.
“…a
thornpain in theside of the status quo[lower and towards the rear].”A drama student writes:
https://twitter.com/chlosha_wilson/status/749158923144458240
Dr. (Heh) Bateman has quite the come-hither look, yes? Pity we have no Michaelangelos to chisel her more solidly into history.
The likes of Bateman often make the point that you do not need to look like a Page 3 model to be attractive and sexy. Which is obviously true, but they say it to imply that they are attractive. The problem is, the likes of Bateman are usually deeply unattractive, if not physically then in the “whole package” sense which is so very important. As somebody said on here recently, beauty is only skin deep but ugliness penetrates to the bone.