Elsewhere (177)
Janice Fiamengo on feminist narratives and unmentioned history:
After 1832, about one in five men had the right to vote. Almost half of adult males, though, were still not eligible to vote when they accepted the call to fight and die for their country in the First World War. It wasn’t until 1918 that the right to vote was extended, not only to women – which of course we hear a great deal about – but to all men. So how can this be – that this part of the story is almost completely unknown? How come when we celebrate the extension of the franchise to women, we don’t talk about its extension to poor and working class men?
Via sk60, Jonathan Foreman on the Tim Hunt “sexism” drama and the dishonesty and malevolence of certain key players:
The most generous interpretation of Connie St Louis’s bizarre behaviour is that she was too intellectually limited to recognise irony that was somehow obvious to an audience composed mostly of people who spoke English as a second language. A leak of the unedited version of her “Stop Defending Tim Hunt” piece for the Guardian is so garbled and incoherent that this actually seems plausible, though it also makes you wonder how and why she came to be teaching journalism even at a third-rate institution like London’s City University.
And Peter Hasson on ‘progressive’ educators and predetermined conclusions:
Multiple professors at Washington State University have explicitly told students their grades will suffer if they use terms such as “illegal alien,” “male,” and “female,” or if they fail to “defer” to non-white students. According to the syllabus for Selena Lester Breikss’ “Women & Popular Culture” class, students risk a failing grade if they use any common descriptors that Breikss considers “oppressive and hateful language.” […] Students taking Professor Rebecca Fowler’s “Introduction to Comparative Ethnic Studies” course will see their grades suffer if they use the term “illegal alien” in their assigned writing.[…] White students in Professor John Streamas’s “Introduction to Multicultural Literature” class are expected to “defer” to non-white students, among other community guidelines, if they want “to do well in this class.”
Imagine what such ‘thinkers’ might do if granted real power.
Feel free to share your own links and snippets in the comments. It’s what these posts are for.
An educated leftist speaks. Seems there are quite a few Lauries in the world.
A lorra lorra Lauries.
An educated leftist speaks.
It’s like SJW twitter took human form.
“It’s like SJW twitter took human form.”
One my favourite comments from that page went something like this:
“It’s like someone built an android and the operating system is Tumblr posts”
It’s like SJW twitter took human form.
Yes, Ms Brooks is practically shuddering with piety. I think my favourite part is when she can’t recall when and where something was allegedly said and instead repeatedly shrieks “I do my research!”
And the shawl – sorry, pashmina – was a really bad idea.
Obviously a sarcastic Pfffft.
Very much an in thing with today’s yoots.
This made me chuckle.

“Just noticed how well the Obama logo works for Trump with some simple color changes and rotation.”
https://twitter.com/ratherironic/status/639144032325636096
I’ll say this for Kate Brooks, there’s a certain magnificence about her ridiculousness. As well as the shawl she should wear a winged helmet and carry a spear. It would really enhance her Wagnerian vibe.
An educated leftist speaks
I managed about 60 seconds of that before involuntarily clicking the delete tab button – impressed that you lasted as long as you did.
I don’t think I’d like to meet her, though I’ve probably shared the street with her, so to speak. What really strikes me is that the kind of really angry and obnoxious feminist of the 1970s and 80s has returned. Back then they were considered a bit crazy by everyone. Now they are practically running the show.
Another example was Brendan O’Neill’s “discussion” with Harriet Brown from the spectator. Joy all round!
On a happier note, I’m vaguely friendly with a postgrad student in her late 20s who can’t stand what happened to Tim Hunt.
impressed that you lasted as long as you did.
I was practically heroic. But it’s interesting how often these displays – and they are displays – rely on an absurd emotionalism. People like Ms Brooks (or Laurie Penny or any number of others) apparently want us to see just how many FEELINGS!™ they’re having, even if those FEELINGS!™ leave them spluttering and incoherent, as if FEELINGS!™ were proof of virtue, a shortcut to “I am obviously right.” Sort of, “I’m having ALL THESE FEELINGS!™ – so many FEELINGS!™ I can’t even think straight – how dare you not defer to me?!”
Which is a bit of a conceit.
Ms. Brooks is very screamy. I can’t hear screamy people.