Friday Ephemera
“Oh, this isn’t so bad.” || Dinner is served. || Dude. || On human biodiversity, a series of documentaries. || Helping hands. || Her pronouns are “a little bit too complicated” to fit in her bio. || At last, tiny power tools. || That’s the spot. || There may have been an explosion. || What’s under the pavement? || The progressive retail experience, parts 411, 412, and 413. || Never say never, they say. || Internet vending machines. || Nice save, sir. || Nice save 2. || Insufferable twat detected. || I think there’s something in the dark. || Creature comfort. || They congratulate themselves. || How to make colour-changing cabbage juice. || “He gets very excited when he sees food.” || And finally, rather briskly, scenes of forbidden love.
Oh, and a reminder that I now have a Gettr account.
More complexity = more bugs.
Wife is right now trying to reset password for the Total Wine app on her iPad. We were encouraged to download/use the app when trying to redeem coupons/rewards at the store yesterday. For some incredibly stupid reason, we cannot enter the reset code via her iPad. I downloaded the app and did it on my iPhone.
Of course all this is MY fault…along with “and this is going to be easier, how?”
Carjacking fail detected.
https://notthebee.com/article/heres-why-you-shouldnt-try-to-carjack-people-who-are-driving-giant-trucks
Carjacking fail detected.
I was hoping to see the carjackers get run over.
But doesn’t IT stand for Intermittent Technology anyway?
No, I think it stands for Imbecile Technologist.
That.
Well, it is pest control.
A couple of years ago, I was standing by the entrance to a local supermarket, laden with bags and checking my phone for the whereabouts of a cab I’d booked. A rough-looking woman in her twenties approached me and asked if she could borrow my phone, which seemed to interest her a great deal. I pointed out that if she needed to make a call, the enquiry desk just inside the supermarket door, maybe six metres away, would most likely oblige. Her eyes moved from the phone to me, and we exchanged a look of, shall we say, mutual understanding.
Needless to say, her disappointment didn’t result in her walking the six metres to the enquiry desk, where a call could have been made. Instead, she wandered off looking for other prey.
No, I think it stands for Imbecile Technologist.
Spend some time with a dozen or so non-technical, non-engineering, non-medical people trying to accomplish anything. Say what you will for imbecile technologists, and I can definitely sympathize, with infinite time things could get worked out. Trying to run just a small board with concerned owner input..well tyranny doesn’t really surprise me anymore. I’m increasingly surprised it’s not more widespread.
Spend some time with a dozen or so non-technical, non-engineering, non-medical people trying to accomplish anything.
In the end, the problem isn’t technologists, or bicyclists, or whatever: It’s people. Endless screw-ups.
Trying to run just a small board with concerned owner input.
You mean like a homeowners association? Board burnout is frequent, thanks in part to dealing with difficult people.
Ahhhh….you’re getting closer! Keep thinking this through…concentrate now…
Instead, she wandered off looking for other prey.
I like a legal system that deals with predators in a long-term way.
What is this? Some kind of nut?
You fix things and they stay fixed just long enough for you to forget how you fixed them, THEN they break again.
That is a brilliant observation!
I fixed a broken dryer three years ago. Took it apart, determined the problem ordered the parts, replaced the parts and put it back together and it worked perfectly. Late last year it broke down again. It was like I had never worked on the thing before.
Some sort of fever dream, I believe. I’m serious. You watch a couple hundred youtube videos, you maybe buy a new tool or two, you go through the problem in your head dozens of times. It’s like you’re in a completely different state of consciousness while you’re doing the project. Then when it’s over, you wake up and it’s like…what just happened?
Pity the parents whose kid is not gifted
My workplace had many people whose kids were, apparently, gifted.
Scholarships, PhDs, international level sportsmen/women etc.
The parents were of course modest and discreet about their kids’ achievements. *Humblebragging *
Here and there, at the photocopier and in quiet corners, those of us with underachieving kids and troublesome teenagers quietly sympathized with each other.
The threat of an unvaccinated foetus
I THINK this might be a parody account, although not as funny as Tatiana McGrath. Not so sure about some of the commenters – they seem to take the message seriously. There was another tweet by this person complaining of lack of free menstrual products in the Walmart men’s room. It could be real – it’s so hard to tell the difference nowadays.
“can I borrow your phone”: I was at a truck stop and a weasel of a guy approached me for a few bucks. Obviously at the location he had to have a car to get there. He got right in my face but as he sized me up decided I was too big and left. White guy by the way.
Another time, a construction looking guy (also white) asked for $. He was so nervous and apologetic that I figured his distress was real and gave him $10.
There have been been several (young, fit, ok dressed) people asking for $ at an intersection with a sign saying “2 kids blah blah”. Different people using the same sign on different days. Literally 30 ft away is “help wanted” and beyond that several help wanted signs. It was tempting to say something.
My workplace had many people whose kids were, apparently, gifted.
Scholarships, PhDs, international level sportsmen/women etc.
The parents were of course modest and discreet about their kids’ achievements. *Humblebragging *
There seems to be a lot of people in white collar occupations who would make charter citizens of Lake Woebegon. It’s become a de rigueur passive/aggressive game of one upsmanship amongst the “UPPER” middle classes.
Same with “upscale travel” Thankfully the coof has put a temporary stop to that.
Hey, how come the Dutch still get to call the place Peking? We were disabised of this when I was in 8th grade. WTF people?
https://mobile.twitter.com/NOS/status/1489578149507698689
Then when it’s over, you wake up and it’s like…what just happened?
I learned long ago to take pics/video of everything I’m doing during a project.
(young, fit, ok dressed) people asking for $ at an intersection with a sign saying “2 kids blah blah”
In my town the police have a policy of picking up the homeless/mendicants and dumping them in the next town over. Which means the mendicants standing on the median with begging signs are all cops checking to see if you’re using your phone while driving.
I used to amuse myself by holding a Hershey bar up to my head and when the cop knocked on my window, pretending to loudly be speaking with the police non-emergency line, reporting a beggar unlawfully standing on the median.
I like a legal system that deals with predators in a long-term way.
I suppose some might regard the woman as an object of pity, but they didn’t see the look of cold hatred when it became obvious that I’d recognised the person trying to rob me as a person trying to rob me. A person who had presumably done it before and would go on to rob others – people less attentive, or more trusting, or just nicer.
For those still having trouble with Twitter, you can fix it by clearing all cookies from Twitter and then blocking Twitter from creating more cookies. I found this advice on another site a few days ago. Sorry I can’t recall where. It’s worked perfectly for me.
Which means the mendicants standing on the median with begging signs are all cops checking to see if you’re using your phone while driving.
Really scruffy looking? Remember detective Mick Belker in Hill Street Blues?
I suppose some might regard the woman as an object of pity…
I used to feel pity for such creatures, and thought that liberal do-gooders were right, but that was a long time ago.
For those still having trouble with Twitter, you can fix it by clearing all cookies…
Thank you! Much appreciated.
If that sounds too harsh and beastly, I suppose they could be rehoused next door to Mr Kotsko here. I’m sure he wouldn’t mind.
Kotsko still says that all white people should kill themselves, and he’s still a professor at Shimer College. Although he is technically a Christian theologian, his beliefs put him far outside of Christian theology and philosophy.
For those still having trouble with Twitter, you can fix it by clearing all cookies…
Tanks. Brave browser on iPad…so that sent me down a rabbit hole of *#$*&#@%&$ technology. No, seriously…send tanks.
No, seriously…send tanks.

You rang?
Bored Ape Yacht Club seems to be trending, probably has been for a while, WTH I’m old. But are we not supposed to notice how bloody obviously derivative they are from Gorillaz? And BAYC is a band as well?
…how bloody obviously derivative they are…
Indeed, and both derivative of the original, The Nairobi Trio.
You rang?
Tankies? 😀
LW: Thank you for the tip.
Indeed, and both derivative of the original, The Nairobi Trio.
Heh. Yes..but no…but yeah.
Really scruffy looking?
Well, they try but since it’s a shit job it’s given to the rookies. That means they’re not too many years off of having to pass the academy physical, which means they’re all young, fit, healthy and over 6′.
If you drive to the town where the derelicts get dumped, you get a much starker picture of what a street beggar looks like.
Oh, the irony! (variation on the “what you really mean is …”) Her facial expressions are amazing.
Her facial expressions are amazing.
Heh. I don’t think Ms McElvoy is coping terribly well, and she’s not far from inadvertently illustrating the point that she claims to have trouble digesting. Which is sort of funny, given her supposed experience in thinking deeply about things. (Ms McElvoy is a senior editor at The Economist and has been a staple of BBC discussion programmes for years. The Moral Maze, Night Waves, etc.)
I still think that’s one of the recurring pleasures of Peterson being interviewed by Our Glorious Betters. They tend to accidentally reveal just how narrow and parochial their chosen worldview is, and just how much mental territory, and everyday experience, has to be avoided or denied, often with some contrivance.
And for those who missed it, still a glorious example.
As noted in the original thread, I can’t think of another interview in which the interviewee has to correct the interviewer – say, on obvious facts or simple points of logic – so many times, after almost every question.
Speaking of irony.
Heh. I don’t think Ms McElvoy is coping terribly well…her supposed experience in thinking deeply…
Heh indeed. These hacks tend to have great difficulty when faced with someone who is well-informed, articulate, and unwilling to defer to them.
“Thinking deeply” is not something that occurs often at The Economist, nor can it as long as they continue to embrace so many falsehoods.
“They tend to accidentally reveal just how narrow and parochial their chosen worldview is, and just how much mental territory, and everyday experience, has to be avoided or denied, often with some contrivance.”
Most of their mental effort must be expended in contriving defenses of harmful policies, leaving very little for doing anything useful: The history of the last 100 years is a chronicle of the repeated failure of leftist ideas. That continued failure has forced the left to invent ever more complex reasons to explain away the failures and claim that their ideas still have merit.
I can’t think of another interview in which the interviewee has to correct the interviewer – say, on obvious facts or simple points of logic – so many times, after almost every question.
It’s still the gold standard of bad interviews.
These hacks tend to have great difficulty when faced with someone who is well-informed, articulate, and unwilling to defer to them.
As many have pointed out, it’s as if the arguments he presents and the statements of the obvious – things one might expect an educated person to know, or know of – are utterly alien to their thinking and therefore bewildering. At best, something to dismiss out of hand, as somehow embarrassing and unworthy of consideration. I suppose it’s the difference between being interested in reality, i.e., finding things out, and being interested in being seen to hold the fashionable opinions of one’s peer group.
The exchange with Ms Newman being a sustained and rather eye-widening example.
They tend to accidentally reveal just how narrow and parochial their chosen worldview is
It was the worldview I was brought up with, not just explicitly, but implicitly in its media associations with attractive sophisticated people. Outside that bright circle it was just unattractive and backward people you didn’t want to be associated with.
The good people have a well-thumbed catalog of stereotypical toxic male behavior, and are always on the watch for a man to use a tone or a form of words that can be put into one of those categories and used against him.
The good people don’t notice when a woman behaves in a stereotypical female way. If they do notice, they don’t mention it. Only unattractive and clueless people do mention it. Mentioning it makes you unattractive (do you even have a girlfriend? what does she think of this?). You’re a bad person who should be shamed, because women are oppressed by people noticing their unflattering patterns of behavior, which don’t exist because they’re stereotypes, and so on.
The good people are aware that polite social interaction, in workplaces for example, often has sexual agendas and undercurrents, and they surf this wave for mutual fulfillment. The clueless prigs are slow to notice it, and offended by what’s been going on under their noses.
Now the last rule has changed since my formative years. Judging by the James Franco case, it seems that good people these days should be ostentatiously clueless and ostentatiously shocked about sexual undercurrents.
That continued failure has forced the left to invent ever more complex reasons to explain away the failures and claim that their ideas still have merit.
One of their chosen defenses is to be stubbornly ignorant of history and economics so they can claim without guilt that Stalin was a great guy and Venezuela collapsed due to western sabotage.
I love Peterson. I think the trucker convoy perfectly illustrates his point that the left pushing too hard leads to a backlash. The Virginia election is another good example. The Left hates cause and effect because it contradicts their preening. Everyone should study how Peterson reasons and debates. He is so precise in what he is saying whereas the interviewer thinks political pushback is domestic violence. hahahah tool
And for those who missed it, still a glorious example.
Yes indeed.
And following that link I found a BBC interview of Thomas Sowell:
The Sowell segment of that BBC show was only 7 minutes long, which meant that even with the best interviewer it could not be better than pathetically superficial. What’s more, a Google search of the BBC website failed to find any other articles or shows about Thomas Sowell. The BBC’s lack of interest in Sowell is quite revealing.
And following that link I found a BBC interview of Thomas Sowell
I’m surprised that I didn’t comment on that thread. Surely that wasn’t before I found your site, was it David?
Surely that wasn’t before I found your site, was it David?
Seems unlikely.
[ Opens safe, checks files. ]
You started commenting here in July 2007. So, no.
But clearly, I need to start taking attendance. Absenteeism will require a note from a parent or guardian.
You started commenting here in July 2007. So, no.
Maybe my visits were infrequent back then–that was also about when I started to spend a lot of time caring for my parents in their last years.
But clearly, I need to start taking attendance.
At least there seems to be no dress code–you have never commented on my state of dress or undress. Much as we have rarely called attention to your blogging thong.
Absenteeism will require a note from a parent or guardian.
What if I declare myself to be my own guardian?
[ Opens safe, checks files. ]
[ Peers over shoulder, attempting to discern combination. ]
What if I declare myself to be my own guardian?
Piker.
I, OTOH, am my own grandpa.
Or something.
Absenteeism will require a note from a parent or guardian.
I had a note but my dog ate it.
“What if I declare myself to be my own guardian?”
There’s a joke about Cleveland in there somewhere, though probably not a very good one.
That Peterson interview, well I thought I saw this here but looking up thread and checking my tabs it seems this one came from Insty. I’m not one to sit through an hour long video interview but this one was well worth it. Though in discussing with my wife over brunch, I rarely learn much from Peterson that I don’t already know, but damn he communicates these things so clearly and precisely. That’s the part I really try to learn.
“Joke About Cleveland” – band name. But again, not a very good one. Kinda like Cleveland.
Absenteeism will require a note from a parent or The Guardian
It’s either my reading comprehension at quick skimming speeds or these outdated spectacles but I coulda sworn….
Harrumph.
Absenteeism will require a note from a parent or The Guardian
You know the folks at The Guardian yearn for such power.
Interesting that the politically correct response in relation to, say, climate change or COVID, is that ‘the science has spoken!’ But in the Peterson interview, the topic is men and women, a magical mystical field which, as we all know, has nothing to do with science, so we get: “I’m not interested in interviewing the clinical data, I’m interested in interviewing you”!