Shocking Developments
Attention, all readers.
Laurie Penny, she of the uneven mind, is no longer an anarcho-communist.
Now she’s an anarcha-feminist. Which is, like, totally different.
Please update your files accordingly.
Attention, all readers.
Laurie Penny, she of the uneven mind, is no longer an anarcho-communist.
Now she’s an anarcha-feminist. Which is, like, totally different.
Please update your files accordingly.
Monty James | September 05, 2018 at 16:27
The international proletarian class deserves the very best.
We *clearly* are not spending *enough* of Other People’s Money. Yes, that must be it. Must also not give up the pretense that piety and not sour grapes is what is separating the current state of envy from one of envy *and* unchecked greed…
What do they teach them at these schools? – Professor Kirke
Based on the history to date, I’d say socialism is about shame, jealousy, envy, and getting together a mob to run a country based on the major headings found in the criminal code.
In a manipulative relationship the manipulator can be very giving, when that suits them as a means towards keeping their target clinging to their orbit. It isn’t about being giving, it is about being perceived as giving in order to keep minds where they want them to stay.
“Luxury socialism” has failed to manifest itself on not only on account of its material and economic impossibility, but its impossibility of character. Socialism is about what those who achieve power through it can take.
If people can just have what they want, then where is the control?
What do they teach them at these schools?
Ahem! The author of that exercise in wishful thinking is working toward a Ph.D. in Harvard’s sociology department, so he’ll be doing the teaching, thank you very much.
In a manipulative relationship the manipulator can be very giving, when that suits them as a means towards keeping their target clinging to their orbit. It isn’t about being giving, it is about being perceived as giving in order to keep minds where they want them to stay.
Back to BPD again – I know a number of women who do a lot of “charity work”, but upon closer inspection it becomes apparent that what they do doesn’t actually benefit the intended recipients so much as make it highly visible how terribly noble and giving these women are.
…upon closer inspection it becomes apparent that what they do doesn’t actually benefit the intended recipients so much as make it highly visible how terribly noble and giving these women are.
I’ve written elsewhere:
Gene Wolfe once posited that there were two types of gods who loved: those whose love was so great that they wanted us to find our own liberty, and those whose love was so great that they wanted us to never escape the realm they controlled. But what is truly then the object of the latter gods’ love, if this is so? What is their realm?
The reference was to Wolfe’s Book of the Long Sun cycle, for the curious.
@Squires: Don’t have that series yet, but I do read Wolfe. I’ve got New Sun and Short Sun.
I know a number of women who do a lot of “charity work”, but upon closer inspection it becomes apparent that what they do doesn’t actually benefit the intended recipients so much as make it highly visible how terribly noble and giving these women are.
Presumably all this anarcho stuff also requires a finely-tuned, centrally administered (generous) welfare system (?).
I might not be understanding it’s finer tenets mind so apologies.