She Is More Educated

In the movie “The Way of The Gun”, Sarah Silverman’s character is talking shit like this in the beginning to Ryan Philippe’s character, who does not hesitate and immediately punches her right in the fucking mouth, knocking her ass down. That is what needs to happen to these kind of people.

I believe she is right about one thing: this is what at racism looks like.

In the name of being anti-racist, they engaged in insults based on race, gender, class, and sexuality. They did this while being verbally and physically threatening. What adult walks up to a stranger in the common area of an apartment complex and starts throwing out fighting words?
It looked like the one guy was peacocking and trying to act tough to impress the girl. And ya, it did look like she was more interested in the guy she was badgering.
The only one of the harassers that said something halfway intelligent was the one who said, “Ya well, he has his own damn opinions.” I almost thought he was going to apologize for his friends.
Democrats have dehumanized and stereotyped people to the point that they think anything can be done to them and that abuse is actually a moral obligation.

The charming young lady, named Erika, has apparently left an apology note.

The charming young lady only apologized after her scheme backfired.
I assume the lovely Erika has realised that her behaviour has now been seen by around a quarter of a million people, some of whom may know her, or her landlord, or her employer. Perhaps she’s afraid that her comeuppance may be at hand.

If “Erika” is truly sorry, she will supply full details of the operation … whose idea it was, who was in on it, who promised what to whom, etc … to the public.
I said “if.”

I am reminded of that young turk douche canoe, saying “we’re not gonna be polite anymore” as he exploded his own head election night. They never were polite. The weathermen throwing sticks of tnt is about as polite as they have ever been.

The people goading him, well they’re not very interesting. Frightening, maybe. So many supposedly well-intentioned Leftists are one step away from this – some of the “tolerant” ones become the nasties (especially when they get a whiff of power)
But the unflappable calm of the guy taking the video… he seems to have Jedi-level mastery over his anger. Quite inspiring, actually. Reminds me of the the police officer here.

The charming young lady, named Erika, has apparently left an apology note.
If it’s genuine, she definitely wants to f**k him. I think she’ll be disappointed though, because he’s thinking this:

Silly children. You need at least a dozen screaming believers for a true Struggle Session.
And some muscle, too, not just ankle-biting Yorkies like Mr. Potty Mouth here, who clearly had no taste for physical persuasion. You need real arm-breakers.

She keeps going on about “free” Wifi, but if he is a resident in the apartment building then surely he has actually paid for the “free” Wifi via his rent and is entitled to use it in the common area? Just ignore me because I haven’t got an education and managed to work that one out easily.
I wonder if we can locate her side of the video?

My first thought: Eviction Notice. An important part of a well-rounded education.
Yeah, I’m not quite buying the sincerity of the note. “I’m writing this letter crying”?
Um, there is one lesson my parents taught me as a kid that is still burned in my memory. I was about 6 and was told to stop throwing dirt clods against the wall of our neighbors house (they made such a satisfying explosion against the stucco, catnip for a kid).
Not only didn’t I stop … I added rocks and started seeing how close I could get to a window without hitting it; and, yep, I broke the window.
My parents marched me over to their home, knock on the door and apologize IN PERSON.
I have never forgotten that experience … I don’t even quite remember the subsequent consequences but the faces of the four adults are seared into my memory.

Bonhoeffer, via Jack:
In conversation with him, one virtually feels that one is dealing not at all with him as a person, but with slogans, catchwords, and the like that have taken possession of him.
That’s got to be the best one-sentence summary of talking with an SJW I’ve ever read.

Yeah, I’m not quite buying the sincerity of the note.
I’ll believe she’s sincere when she volunteers to live somewhere else.

. . . clothes bearing writing, particularly slogans. It seems at best naff and at worst poor manners.
Depends on the details . . .
Human billboards are tiresome.
Yes. That would be stock variety peons wearing The Label.
Therefore, the issue is a matter of what is displayed. A favorite t shirt of mine for awhile showed the following:
The alphabet in alphabetical order.
Aitch, Are, Ay, Bee, Cue, Dee, Double U, Ee, Ef, El, Em, En, Ess, Ex, Eye, Gee, Jay, Kay, Oh, Pea, See, Tee, Vee, Wy, Yu, Zee.

Correction. Nathan’s “Korea” reference begins about 9:33.

Darleen. What makes you think it wasn’t “a complete set-up”. The whole thing has a “stagey” feel to it much of the time and the woman, whose face you can never really see clearly, sounds to me more like an Asian mimicking a Hispanic accent, than a Mexican.

Hal. If I were Jewish that would be one of my questions too. Also, the 6 million who were exterminated by Hitler – that doesn’t seem like much of a plan to me.
Darlene. I should add that I’m not totally convinced the video is fake. However, even if it’s real, he’s more of a pimp (for neo-Naziism) than a prostitute, to borrow your metaphor.

Wow. What bastards. He certainly handled it well.

I’m in favour of relatively open borders and tolerance and love and joy and all that hippy shit, but if I was a Yank right now watching that, and it was before the election, it would make me go off and merrily cast a vote for Trump with a song in my heart.

What makes you think it wasn’t “a complete set-up”
I’m always open to the possibility – but I won’t base my decision on the guy’s unsavory character.
There has been way too many instances like that – recall the unfortunate white guy in dreads being attacked for ‘cultural appropriation’? Then there are people like Melissa Click (hope to God she’s not a relative).
Of all the ‘hate crime’ video hoaxes, I haven’t yet run across one trying to smear lefties — they seem to do perfectly fine on their own.

Holy Mary, Mother of Jesus, R. Sherman!
The link is long but WOW. No wonder the American Left-fascists want to leave for Canada … their authoritarianism is on the fast tract to full fruition.

Do you believe that you or others could be imprisoned for refusing to comply with these laws?
There’s no doubt about that. The human rights tribunals have been given the right to hold people in contempt. Well, you’re going to be in contempt if you don’t pay the fine. My opponents say ‘you’re just scare-mongering. We don’t really have that much power.’ Then why change the criminal code? Why put the hate speech amendments in there? The final word in law is incarceration. There is no question about this. When I made the video on September 27th, and I said, ‘probably making this video itself is illegal’. Not only that, the university is as responsible as I am for making it, because that’s in the human rights code. The university read the damned policies and had their lawyers scour it, and concluded exactly what I concluded. That’s why they sent me two warning letters. They’re on the hook for everything their employees say, whether or not the consequences of what they say were intentional or unintentional, regardless of whether or not there was a complaint.
Does that include things that my employees say in their private time?
It includes everything they say. It doesn’t matter whether people complain or not. Even if no one complains, or even if the effect is unintentional. The other thing that’s built into this law and the surrounding policies – and this is also increasingly the case in sexual harassment tribunals on university campuses which the [Ontario Premier Kathleen] Wynne government is pushing like mad – they’ve changed two legal principles. It’s not ‘innocent before being proven guilty,’ it’s ‘preponderance of evidence,’ and it’s not intent, it’s outcome. Those transformations are so far reaching, it’s almost unimaginable.
Are you suggesting they’ve altered the rule of law as we traditionally understand it?
They have. They say ‘what you said hurt my feelings’ – and this is part of the assault on the objective world – your intent is irrelevant. My subjective response is the determining factor. The idea that they would dare to undermine the doctrine of intent is beyond belief.

@Darleen, I’ve just finished reading that interview. Scary stuff. Reminded me of a short story I read online a decade or so ago (and can’t find now, dammit!) about a trial in which the judge had to wait to channel his spirit guide before proceedings could begin, objective evidence was dismissed as inferior to spectral evidence, and the possibility that the Greys were manipulating events was given serious consideration by the court.
Wish I could find that story. It used to be funny.

Greg W
Why do you assume I haven’t watched the video? I did, until the end. It isn’t much different from this except the person of pallor tried to walk away and the chick grabbed him, then shoved her hand into the camera. Later, she claimed it was all the white guy’s fault.
What is it about the guy’s opinions – even if deranged and anti-Semitic – have no bearing on this harassment. that you don’t get?
It appears “stagey” to you, it doesn’t to me because if this guy is trolling, he might have done a lot better & snappier in his come-backs. It would have made him look better and isn’t that what trolls want? To show themselves in the most flattering light? Especially when little miss escalates to mocking his sexual performance … I’ve witnessed that in online flame wars and, unfortunately, in-person catfights.
Show me something beyond “the guy is a douchebag” that sustains your assertion that this is a fake video, I will evaluate it. Until then, I’ve seen nothing that demonstrates this is a hoax.

Darleen,
… their authoritarianism is on the fast tract to full fruition.
I seem to recall, and forgive me if I don’t have all the details, Mark Steyn smacked down one of those “human rights” tribunals committees star chambers so badly that the Canadian government repealed the law they were using against him, out of embarrassment.